Part 33 Expert evidence
| Title | Number |
|---|---|
| Rule | |
| Reference to expert | Rule 33.1 |
| Expert’s duty to the court | Rule 33.2 |
| Content of expert’s report | Rule 33.3 |
| Expert to be informed of service of report | Rule 33.4 |
| Pre-hearing discussion of expert evidence | Rule 33.5 |
| Failure to comply with directions | Rule 33.6 |
| Court’s power to direct that evidence is to be given by a single joint expert | Rule 33.7 |
| Instructions to a single joint expert | Rule 33.8 |
[Note. See rule 2.1(4) for the application of the rules in this Part. Part 24 contains rules about the disclosure of the substance of expert evidence. For the use of an expert report as evidence, see section 30 of the Criminal Justice Act 19881.]
Reference to expert
33.1
A reference to an ‘expert’ in this Part is a reference to a person who is required to give or prepare expert evidence for the purpose of criminal proceedings, including evidence required to determine fitness to plead or for the purpose of sentencing.
[Note. Expert medical evidence may be required to determine fitness to plead under section 4 of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 19642. It may be required also under section 11 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 20003, under Part III of the Mental Health Act 19834 or under Part 12 of the Criminal Justice Act 20035. Those Acts contain requirements about the qualification of medical experts.]
Expert’s duty to the court
33.2
(1) An expert must help the court to achieve the overriding objective by giving objective, unbiased opinion on matters within his expertise.
(2) This duty overrides any obligation to the person from whom he receives instructions or by whom he is paid.
(3) This duty includes an obligation to inform all parties and the court if the expert’s opinion changes from that contained in a report served as evidence or given in a statement under Part 24 or Part 29.
Content of expert’s report
33.3
(1) An expert’s report must –
(a) give details of the expert’s qualifications, relevant experience and accreditation;
(b) give details of any literature or other information which the expert has relied on in making the report;
(c) contain a statement setting out the substance of all facts given to the expert which are material to the opinions expressed in the report or upon which those opinions are based;
(d) make clear which of the facts stated in the report are within the expert's own knowledge;
(e) say who carried out any examination, measurement, test or experiment which the expert has used for the report and –
(i) give the qualifications, relevant experience and accreditation of that person,
(ii) say whether or not the examination, measurement, test or experiment was carried out under the expert's supervision, and
(iii) summarise the findings on which the expert relies;
(f) where there is a range of opinion on the matters dealt with in the report –
(i) summarise the range of opinion, and
(ii) give reasons for his own opinion;
(g) if the expert is not able to give his opinion without qualification, state the qualification;
(h) contain a summary of the conclusions reached;
(i) contain a statement that the expert understands his duty to the court, and has complied and will continue to comply with that duty; and
(j) contain the same declaration of truth as a witness statement.
(2) Only sub-paragraphs (i) and (j) of rule 33.3(1) apply to a summary by an expert of his conclusions served in advance of that expert’s report.
[Note. Part 24 contains rules about the disclosure of the substance of expert evidence. Part 27 contains rules about witness statements. Declarations of truth in witness statements are required by section 9 of the Criminal Justice Act 19676 and section 5B of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 19807. A party who accepts another party’s expert’s conclusions may admit them as facts under section 10 of the Criminal Justice Act 19678. Evidence of examinations etc. on which an expert relies may be admissible under section 127 of the Criminal Justice Act 20039.]
Expert to be informed of service of report
33.4
A party who serves on another party or on the court a report by an expert must, at once, inform that expert of that fact.
Pre-hearing discussion of expert evidence
33.5
(1) This rule applies where more than one party wants to introduce expert evidence.
(2) The court may direct the experts to –
(a) discuss the expert issues in the proceedings; and
(b) prepare a statement for the court of the matters on which they agree and disagree, giving their reasons.
(3) Except for that statement, the content of that discussion must not be referred to without the court’s permission.
Failure to comply with directions
33.6
A party may not introduce expert evidence without the court’s permission if the expert has not complied with a direction under rule 33.5.
[Note. At a pre-trial hearing a court may make binding rulings about the admissibility of evidence and about questions of law under section 7 of the Criminal Justice Act 198710; sections 31 and 40 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 199611; and section 45 of the Courts Act 200312.]
Court’s power to direct that evidence is to be given by a single joint expert
33.7
(1) Where more than one defendant wants to introduce expert evidence on an issue at trial, the court may direct that the evidence on that issue is to be given by one expert only.
Instructions to a single joint expert
33.8
(1) Where the court gives a direction under rule 33.7 for a single joint expert to be used, each of the co-defendants may give instructions to the expert.
(2) When a co-defendant gives instructions to the expert he must, at the same time, send a copy of the instructions to the other co-defendant(s).
(3) The court may give directions about –
(a) the payment of the expert’s fees and expenses; and
(b) any examination, measurement, test or experiment which the expert wishes to carry out.
(4) The court may, before an expert is instructed, limit the amount that can be paid by way of fees and expenses to the expert.
(5) Unless the court otherwise directs, the instructing co-defendants are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the expert’s fees and expenses.

