Independent report

Independent criminal advocacy in England and Wales

Final report of an independent review led by Sir Bill Jeffrey on the provision of independent criminal advocacy services.

Documents

Independent criminal advocacy in England and Wales: Jeffrey Review final report

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email web.comments@justice.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Independent criminal advocacy in England and Wales: annexes

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email web.comments@justice.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Independent criminal advocacy in England and Wales: analytical narrative

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email web.comments@justice.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Eiriolaeth droseddol annibynnol yng Nghymru a Lloegr (Welsh)

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email web.comments@justice.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

The review considered the provision of independent criminal advocacy services in courts in England and Wales, looking at the:

  • experience, capabilities and skills needed for these services
  • arrangements for training
  • standards needed to maintain and improve the quality of advocacy
  • future structure of the profession providing advocacy services

The review did not consider legal aid fee rates or public funding requirements, which were outside its remit.

Published 7 May 2014