Ministry of Justice

Reports into the management of Dano Sonnex within the criminal justice system

04 June 2009

Statue of Justice, the Old Bailey, London

The Ministry of Justice has published reports on the management of Dano Sonnex within the criminal justice system, following his conviction for the murders of French students Laurent Bonomo and Gabriel Ferez.

Today, Dano Sonnex and Nigel Farmer were found guilty of the appalling murders of French students Laurent Bonomo and Gabriel Ferez.

At the time of the murders, Dano Sonnex was subject to a warrant for his arrest and recall to prison for breach of his probation licence conditions.

The following documents are now available on the Ministry of Justice website:

  • a comprehensive National Offender Management Service (NOMS) investigation report
  • the NOMS response to the investigation report
  • a report from the London Criminal Justice Board
  • the Serious Further Offence case review by London Probation.

The recommendations of all the reports have been accepted in full by the Ministry of Justice.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission is publishing a report into the police aspects of this case. HM Inspectorate of Probation has published a casework inspection into Greenwich and Lewisham, which had responsibility for managing Dano Sonnex.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw said:

‘On behalf of the Government, I express my deepest sympathies to the families of Mr Bonomo and Mr Ferez and I am ensuring they receive every possible support.

‘These were the most appalling, sadistic, and gratuitous murders. The direct responsibility for these killings must lie – as the jury found – with the criminals Sonnex and Farmer. But it is also the case that Sonnex could and should have been in custody at the time he committed these murders. It was the consequence of very serious failures across the criminal justice system that he had not been arrested and incarcerated some weeks before.

‘It is because of these failings that I have met the families of the two victims on two occasions and apologised to them for the failings which led to Dano Sonnex being free at the time of the murders. In relation to the failings of the probation service, I take full responsibility as Secretary of State. They were unacceptable and had tragic consequences.

‘Whilst risk can never be eliminated entirely and the management of chaotic offenders is inherently very difficult, there is clear evidence of poor judgement and failures to act promptly by the agencies responsible for managing Dano Sonnex.’

The Justice Secretary, National Offender Management Service and Home Office took swift action to seek to address the failings which have emerged through consideration of the Sonnex case.

  • A series of thorough reviews were set in train. This has included a serious further offence review, an independent review by the National Offender Management Service, and inquiries by the Independent Police Complaints Commission and the London Criminal Justice Board. All recommendations from these reports have been accepted.
  • Mr Straw accepted the recommendation from NOMS that the failings in London Probation were so serious that they constituted grounds for performance capability procedures against the Chief Officer of London Probation, who acknowledged the failings and resigned his position.
  • A new interim Chief Officer of London Probation, Paul Wilson, was appointed in early March and has already initiated many changes.
  • London Probation produced a detailed performance action plan, which will be led by a new Chief currently being recruited. London Probation is improving performance rapidly through procedures such as prioritised training, daily meetings, new monthly targets, speedy recall processes and task forces for IT and HR.
  • 100 new probation officers will be recruited in London in the next two years.
  • Staff with responsibility for managing this case have been investigated under internal procedures and appropriate action taken. The Independent Police Complaints Commission investigated the actions of the police officers responsible for recalling Sonnex to custody. As a result, one officer received a disciplinary warning.
  • The results of this work will be independently scrutinised by the Chief Inspector of Probation, who is currently conducting a case inspection in specific areas of London Probation at the Justice Secretary’s request. The Chief Inspector will report back by September and has agreed to repeat the exercise 12 months later to assess whether the necessary improvements have been delivered and maintained.
  • The Metropolitan Police now has a unit in each London Borough dedicated to arresting wanted offenders. And it has put in place revised systems, with other agencies, to improve information-sharing and ensure the clear identification and timely arrest of such offenders.

Jack Straw continued:

‘I will personally monitor progress closely until I am satisfied that high standards are being achieved. I will also be making a statement in parliament about this as soon as possible. All of the reports within my ambit will be presented to parliament and made public.

‘There may be those who assert that insufficient probation service resources was a factor in these failings. This is emphatically not the case. Probation spending has increased 70% in real terms in the last 12 years. Last year London Probation under spent by £3.5 million on a budget of £154 million, and the service as a whole under spent by £17 million. The fundamental problems – as the independent reports emphasise – were managerial. It was a failure to allocate London Probation resources sensibly between the different areas, to supervise workloads, and to heed obvious warning signs – like sickness rates in Lewisham and Greenwich probation area being an average of 27 days per year, more than twice the London Probation average.

‘Probation officers do an extremely tough job supervising difficult and dangerous people. The number of serious further offence convictions against all offenders supervised by the Probation Service is actually around 0.35% and in London it is approximately 0.2% of London’s total caseload. I do not want this to be a reflection on the valuable work they do every day to protect the public, reduce re-offending and support victims.’


This page was printed from the Ministry of Justice website. It is subject to © Crown Copyright