PRACTICE DIRECTION 36C - PILOT SCHEME: CARE AND SUPERVISION PROCEEDINGS AND OTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER PART 4 OF THE CHILDREN ACT 1989
PRACTICE DIRECTION 36C – PILOT SCHEME: CARE AND SUPERVISION PROCEEDINGS AND OTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER PART 4 OF THE CHILDREN ACT 1989
This Practice Direction supplements FPR Part 36, rule 36.2 (Transitional Arrangements and Pilot Schemes)
|The relevant start date||Para. 2.1|
|Publication of relevant start date||Para. 3.1|
|Purpose of the pilot scheme||Para. 4.1|
|Modification of the FPR and Practice Directions during operation of the pilot scheme||Para. 5.1|
This Practice Direction is made under rule 36.2 and sets up a Pilot Scheme. The Pilot Scheme applies to Part 4 proceedings (defined in FPR 12.2 as modified by paragraph 6.1 below) which are started –
(1) in any magistrates' court, county court and the High Court in accordance with the Allocation Order and the Guidance on allocation of proceedings issued from time to time by the President of the Family Division;
(2) on the Relevant Start Date in relation to that court (see paragraph 2.1 below) or any time from that date until 31st March 2014;
The list of courts choosing to start operating the Pilot Scheme from 1st July 2013 may be found (from 25th June 2013) at http://www.justice.gov.uk/protecting-the-vulnerable/care-proceedings-reform. Courts joining the Pilot Scheme after 1st July will be added to the list of courts on the website not less than 7 working days before the Relevant Start Date.
The purpose of the Pilot Scheme is to assess the use of new practices and procedures to support the 26 week time limit for Part 4 proceedings in the amendments made to section 32 of the Children Act 1989 by clause 14 of the Children and Families Bill, as introduced into Parliament on 4th February 2013.
During the operation of the Pilot Scheme the Family Procedure Rules 2010 and the Practice Directions supporting those Rules will apply as modified by paragraphs 6.1 to 14.1.
Modification of FPR Part 12
In rule 12.2 –
(1) for the definition of “Case Management Order”, substitute –
“‘Case Management Order’ means an order in the form referred to in Practice Direction 12A or Pilot Practice Direction 12A;”;
(2) after the definition of “interim order” insert –
“‘Part 4 proceedings’ means proceedings for –
(a) a care order except an interim care order, or the discharge of such an order under section 39(1) of the 1989 Act;
(b) an order giving permission to change a child's surname or remove a child from the United Kingdom under section 33(7) of the 1989 Act whle a care order is in force with respect to the child;
(c) a supervision order except an interim supervision order, the discharge or variation of such an order under section 39(2) of the 1989 Act, or the extension or further extension of such an order under paragraph 6(3) of Schedule 3 to that Act;
(d) an order making provision regarding contact under section 34(2) to (4) of the 1989 Act made at the same time as the making of a care order other than an interim care order or later or an order varying or discharging such an order under section 34(9) of that Act;
(e) an education supervision order, the extension of an education supervision order under paragraph 15(2) of Schedule 3 to the 1989 Act, or the discharge of such an order under paragraph 17(1) of Schedule 3 to that Act;
(f) an order under section 39(3) of the 1989 Act varying a supervision order in so far as it affects a person with whom the child is living but who is not entitled to apply for the order to be discharged; or
(g) the substitution of a supervision order for a care order under section 39(4) of the 1989 Act;”;
(3) In the definition of “public law proceedings” –
(a) after “‘public law proceedings’ means”, insert “Part 4 proceedings and”;
(b) in paragraph (d) of the definition, for “a care order” substitute “an interim care order”;
(c) in paragraph (e) of the definition, after “1989 Act” insert “while an interim care order is in force with respect to the child”;
(d) in paragraph (f) of the definition, for “a supervision order under section 31(1)(b)” substitute ‘an interim supervision order under section 38(1)’;
(e) in paragraph (g) of the definition, after “1989 Act” insert ‘made at the same time as the making of an interim care order or later’;
(f) in paragraph (j) of the definition, for “a supervision order” substitute ‘an interim supervision order’;
(g) omit paragraphs (h) and (m) of the definition.
In rule 12.5 –
(1) for paragraph (a)(iii), substitute “(iii) in Part 4 proceedings, the Case Management Hearing;”;
(2) at the end of paragraph (a)(iii) omit “or”;
(3) after paragraph (a)(iii), insert “(iiia) in so far as practicable in public law proceedings other than Part 4 proceedings, the First Appointment; or”;
(4) in paragraph (a) after “Practice Directions 12A or B”, insert “and Pilot Practice Direction 12A”;
(5) in paragraph (c) after “Practice Directions 12A or B”, insert “, Pilot Practice Direction 12A”;
(6) at the beginning of the words in parentheses following the rule, insert “Pilot Practice Direction 12A sets out the details relating to the Case Management Hearing and”.
In rule 12.7(2)(b) –
After rule 12.8, insert –
“(Practice Direction 12C (Service of Application in Certain Children Proceedings) provides that in Part 4 proceedings the minimum number of days prior to the Case Management Hearing for service of the application and accompanying documents is 7 days. The Court has discretion to extend or shorten this time (see rule 4.1(3) (a)).)”.
After the heading to Chapter 3 “SPECIAL PROVISIONS ABOUT PUBLIC LAW PROCEEDINGS”, insert –
The timetable for the proceedings
The court will draw up the timetable for the proceedings or revise that timetable with a view to disposing of the proceedings without delay.
The Case Management Hearing and the Issues Resolution Hearing
(1) The court will conduct the Case Management Hearing with the objective of –
(a) confirming the court to which the proceedings have been allocated or, if necessary, considering transfer of the proceedings in accordance with the Allocation Order;
(b) drawing up a timetable for the proceedings in accordance with rule 12.21B including the time within which the proceedings are to be resolved;
(c) identifying the issues;
(d) giving directions in accordance with rule 12.12 and Pilot Practice Direction 12A to manage the proceedings.
(2) The court may hold a Further Case Management Hearing only where this hearing is necessary to fulfil the objectives of the Case Management Hearing set out in paragraph (1).
(3) The court will conduct the Issues Resolution Hearing with the objective of –
(a) identifying the remaining issues in the proceedings;
(b) as far as possible resolving or narrowing those issues;
(c) giving directions to manage the proceedings to the final hearing in accordance with rule 12.12 and Pilot Practice Direction 12A.
(4) Where it is possible for all the issues in the proceedings to be resolved at the Issues Resolution Hearing, the court may treat the Issues Resolution Hearing as a final hearing and make orders disposing of the proceedings.
(5) The court may set the date for the Case Management Hearing, a Further Case Management Hearing and the Issues Resolution Hearing at the times referred to in Pilot Practice Direction 12A.
(6) The matters which the court will consider at the hearings referred to in this rule are set out in Pilot Practice Direction 12A.
(Rule 25.6 (experts: when to apply for the court's permission) provides that unless the court directs otherwise, parties must apply for the court's permission as mentioned in rule 25.4 as soon as possible and in Part 4 Proceedings no later than the Case Management Hearing.)
Discussion between advocates
(1) When setting a date for the Case Management Hearing or the Issues Resolution Hearing the court will direct a discussion between the parties' advocates to –
(a) discuss the provisions of a draft of the Case Management Order; and
(b) consider any other matter set out in Pilot Practice Direction 12A.
(2) Where there is a litigant in person the court will give directions about how that person may take part in the discussions between the parties' advocates.
(3) Unless the court directs otherwise –
(a) any discussion between advocates must take place no later than 2 days before the Case Management Hearing; and
(b) a draft of the Case Management Order must be filed with the court no later than 11 a.m. on the day before the Case Management Hearing.
(4) Unless the court directs otherwise –
(a) any discussion between advocates must take place no later than 7 days before the Issues Resolution Hearing; and
(b) a draft of the Case Management Order must be filed with the court no later than 11a.m. on the day before the Issues Resolution Hearing.
(5) For the purposes of this rule 'advocate' includes a litigant in person.”.
Modification of FPR Part 25
For FPR 25.6, substitute –
“When to apply for the court's permission
Unless the court directs otherwise, parties must apply for the court's permission as mentioned in rule 25.4 as soon as possible and –
(a) in Part 4 proceedings referred to in rule 12.2, no later than the Case Management Hearing;
(b) in public law proceedings other than Part 4 proceedings referred to in rule 12.2, no later than the Case Management Conference;
(c) in public law proceedings referred to in rule 12.2, no later than the First Hearing Dispute Resolution Appointment;
(d) in adoption proceedings and placement proceedings, no later than the first directions hearing;
(e) in proceedings for a financial remedy, no later than the first appointment;
(f) in a defended case referred to in rule 7.1(3), no later than any case management hearing directed by the court under rule 7.20.”.
Modification of Practice Direction 5A (Forms)
In Table 1(Index to forms), in the box in column 2 which applies to FPR Part 12 –
(1) omit “C17” and “C17A”;
(2) for “C11O” substitute “C110A”, and
(3) after “PLP 10” insert, “(PLO8 and PLO9 do not apply to Part 4 proceedings)”.
Application of Practice Direction 12A (Public Law Proceedings: Guide to Case Management) and Pilot Practice Direction 12A (Care, Supervision and Other Part 4 Proceedings: Guide to Case Management)
In relation to public law proceedings other than Part 4 proceedings, Practice Direction 12A will apply, so far as practicable, without modification.
In relation to Part 4 proceedings, Pilot Practice Direction 12A as set out in the Annex to this Practice Direction will apply in place of Practice Direction 12A.
Modification of Practice Direction 12C (Service of Application in Children Proceedings)
In the Table in paragraph 1.1 –
(1) in Box 3,column 1, after “(section 31 of the 1989 Act)” insert “and other Part 4 proceedings”;
(2) in Box 3, column 2, for “Form C110” substitute “Form C110A”.
For paragraph 1.2, substitute –
When filing the documents referred to in column 2 of the Table in paragraph 1.1, the applicant must also file sufficient copies for one to be served on each respondent and, except for Part 4 proceedings, Cafcass or CAFCASS CYMRU. In relation to Part 4 proceedings, the applicant need not file a copy of the documents for Cafcass or CAFCASS CYMRU as it is the applicant who sends copies of these documents to Cafcass or CAFCASS CYMRU in accordance with Pilot Practice Direction 12A.”.
In the table in paragraph 2.1
(1) in Box 1,column 1, after “( s33(7) of the 1989 Act)” insert “while an interim care order is in force with respect to the child”;
(2) in Box 2, column 1, after “(section 14A of the 1989 Act)” insert –
“care or supervision order (section 31 of the 1989 Act) except an interim care order or an interim supervision order (section 38 (1) of the 1989 Act);
an order permitting the child's name to be changed or the removal of the child from the United Kingdom ( s33(7) of the 1989 Act) while a care order is in force with respect to the child”;
an order making provision for contact under section 34(2) to (4) of the 1989 Act made at the same time as the making of a care order other than an interim care order or later or an order varying or discharging such an order under section 34(9) of the 1989 Act;”;
(3) in Box 3, column 1 –
(a) for “care or supervision order (section 31 of the 1989 Act)” substitute “an interim care order or an interim supervision order (section 38 (1) of the 1989 Act)”;
(b) after “section 34(2) to (4) of the 1989 Act”, insert “made at the same time as the making of an interim care order or later”.
Modifications to Practice Direction 27A (Family Proceedings: Court Bundles: (Universal Practice to be Applied in all Courts other than the Family Proceedings Court)
In Practice Direction 27A –
(1) in the heading omit “Other than the Family Proceedings Court”;
(2) in paragraph 1.1 omit “(other than the Family Proceedings Court)”;
(3) in paragraph 2.1(d) omit “except for Family Proceedings Courts”;
(4) for paragraph 2.2 substitute –
“‘Hearings’ includes –
(a) all appearances before a judge, district judge or a magistrates' court, whether with or without notice to other parties and whether for directions or for substantive relief; and
(b) in a magistrates' court, references to a directions appointment whether conducted by the justices, a district judge (magistrates' court ) or a justices' clerk.”;
(5) at the beginning of paragraph 2.5, insert “In relation to a county court or the High Court,”;
(6) in paragraph 4.1, for “a judge” substitute “the court”;
(7) in paragraph 6.1, for the references to “case management conference” substitute “Case Management Hearing”;
(8) in paragraphs 6.3, 7.1,and 12.1, for “judge” substitute “court”;
(9) in paragraph 7.2 –
(a) for “Unless the judge” substitute “Unless the court”;
(b) in sub paragraph (c) for “for hearings at any other court” substitute “for hearings in a county court or the High Court”;
(c) after sub paragraph (c) insert “(d) in the magistrates' court, at the court office of the court where the hearing is to take place.”;
(10) the reference to –
(a) the “Public Law Protocol (2003) 2 FLR 719” in paragraph 6.1;
(b) the “Practice Direction: Care Cases: Judicial Continuity and Judicial Case Management appended to the Public Law Protocol (2003) 2FLR 719” in paragraph 15; and
(c) “the Public Law Protocol” in paragraph 15,
shall be read as if it were a reference to Pilot Practice Direction 12A Care Supervision and Other Part 4 Proceedings: Guide to Case Management contained in Practice Direction 36C.
Modifications to Practice Direction 27B (Attendance of Media Representatives at Hearings in Family Proceedings)
In paragraph 2.1(a), after “Case Management Conferences” insert “Case Management Hearings, any Further Case Management Hearings”.
Pilot Practice Direction 12A – Care, supervision and other Part 4 proceedings: guide to case management
The key stages of the court process
The Public Law Outline set out in the Table below contains an outline of –
(1) the order of the different stages of the process;
(2) the matters to be considered at the main case management hearings;
(3) the latest timescales within which the main stages of the process should take place in order to achieve the aim of resolving the proceedings within 26 weeks.
In the Public Law Outline –
(1) ‘CMH’ means the Case Management Hearing;
(2) ‘FCMH’ means Further Case Management Hearing;
(3) ‘ICO’ means interim care order;
(4) ‘IRH’ means the Issues Resolution Hearing;
(5) ‘LA’ means the Local Authority which is applying for a care or supervision order or a final order in other Part 4 Proceedings;
(6) ‘OS’ means the Official Solicitor.
In applying the provisions of FPR Part 12 and the Public Law Outline the court and the parties must also have regard to –
(1) all other relevant rules and Practice Directions and in particular –
- FPR Part 1 (Overriding Objective);
- FPR Part 4 (General Case Management Powers);
- FPR Part 15 (Representation of Protected Parties) and Practice Direction 15B (Adults Who May Be Protected Parties and Children Who May Become Protected Parties in Family Proceedings);
- FPR Part 22 (Evidence);
- FPR Part 25 (Experts) and the Experts Practice Directions;
- FPR 27.6 and Practice Direction 27A (Court Bundles);
(2) President's Guidance issued from time to time on
- Allocation and Gatekeeping;
- Judicial continuity and deployment;
- Prescribed templates and orders;
(3) Justices' Clerks Rules 2005 and FPR Practice Direction 2A (Functions of the Court In The Family Procedure Rules 2010 And Practice Directions Which May Be Performed By a Single Justice of the Peace).
Annex Documents are the documents specified in the Annex to the Application Form which are to be attached to that form and filed with the court:
Checklist documents (already existing on the LA's files) are –
(a) Evidential documents including –
(b) Decision-making records including –
|Only Checklist documents in (a) are to be served with the application form|
|Checklist Documents in (b) are to be disclosed on request by any party|
Checklist documents are not to be –
|Stage 1 – Issue and Allocation|
|Day 1 and day 2|
On Day 1 (Day of issue):
|Stage 2 – Case Management Hearing|
(including any litigants in person (FPR12.21E(5))
|Case Management Hearing|
No later than 2 clear days before CMH (or FCMH if it is necessary)
CMH : by Day 12
A FCMH is to be held only if necessary, it is to be listed as soon as possible and in any event no later than day 20 (week 4)
|Stage 3 – Issues Resolution Hearing|
(including any litigants in person (FPR12.21E(5))
No later than 7 days before the IRH
As directed by the court, in accordance with the timetable for the proceedings
Flexible powers of the court
Attention is drawn to the flexible powers of the court either following the issue of the application in that court, the transfer of the case to that court or at any other stage in the proceedings.
The court may give directions without a hearing including setting a date for the Final Hearing or a period within which the Final Hearing will take place. The steps, which the court will ordinarily take at the various stages of the proceedings provided for in the Public Law Outline, may be taken by the court at another stage in the proceedings if the circumstances of the case merit this approach.
The flexible powers of the court include the ability for the court to cancel or repeat a particular hearing. For example, if the issue on which the case turns can with reasonable practicability be crystallised and resolved by taking evidence at an IRH then such a flexible approach must be taken in accordance with the overriding objective and to secure compliance with section 1(2) of the 1989 Act and achieving the aim of resolving the proceedings within 26 weeks or the period for the time being specified by the court.
Where it is anticipated that oral evidence may be required at the CMH, FCMH or IRH, the court must be notified in accordance with Stages 2 and 3 of the Public Law Outline well in advance and directions sought for the conduct of the hearing.
It is expected that full case management will take place at the CMH. It follows that the parties must be prepared to deal with all relevant case management issues, as identified in Stage 2 of the Public Law Outline. A FCMH should only be directed where necessary and must not be regarded as a routine step in proceedings.
Compliance with Pre-proceedings Checklist
It is recognised that in a small minority of cases the circumstances are such that the safety and welfare of the child may be jeopardised if the start of proceedings is delayed until all of the documents appropriate to the case and referred to in the Pre-proceedings Checklist are available. The safety and welfare of the child should never be put in jeopardy because of lack of documentation. (Nothing in this Practice Direction affects an application for an emergency protection order under section 44 of the 1989 Act).
The court recognises that the preparation may need to be varied to suit the circumstances of the case. In cases where any of the Annex Documents required to be attached to the Application Form are not available at the time of issue of the application, the court will consider making directions on issue about when any missing documentation is to be filed. The expectation is that there must be a good reason why one or more of the documents are not available. Further directions relating to any missing documentation will also be made at the Case Management Hearing.
The court considers the allocation of proceedings in accordance with the Allocation Order and whether transfer is appropriate in accordance with this Order and the Guidance issued by the President on Allocation and Gatekeeping. When proceedings are issued in the magistrates' court the justices' clerk or assistant justices' clerk (with responsibility for gatekeeping and allocation of proceedings) will discuss allocation and transfer with a district judge of the county court (with responsibility for allocation and gatekeeping of proceedings as provided for in the Guidance issued by the President on Allocation and Gatekeeping) and will, where appropriate, transfer the case.
The timetable for the child and the timetable for proceedings
The timetable for the proceedings –
(1) The court will draw up a timetable for the proceedings with a view to disposing of the application –
(a) without delay; and
(b) in any event with the aim of doing so within 26 weeks beginning with the day on which the application was issued.
(2) The court, when drawing up or revising a timetable under paragraph (1), will in particular have regard to –
(a) the impact which the timetable or any revised timetable would have on the welfare of the child to whom the application relates; and
(b) the impact which the timetable or any revised timetable would have on the duration and conduct of the proceedings.
The impact which the timetable for the proceedings, any revision or extension of that timetable would have on the welfare of the child to whom the application relates are matters to which the court is to have particular regard. The court will use the Timetable for the Child to assess the impact of these matters on the welfare of the child and to draw up and revise the timetable for the proceedings.
The ‘Timetable for the Child’ is the timetable set by the court which takes into account dates which are important to the child's welfare and development.
The timetable for the proceedings is set having particular regard to the Timetable for the Child and the Timetable for the Child needs to be reviewed regularly. Where adjustments are made to the Timetable for the Child, the timetable for the proceedings will have to be reviewed consistently with the aim of resolving the proceedings within 26 weeks or the period for the time being specified by the court.
Examples of the dates the court will record and take into account when setting the Timetable for the Child are the dates of –
(1) any formal review by the Local Authority of the case of a looked after child (within the meaning of section 22(1) of the 1989 Act);
(2) any significant educational steps, including the child taking up a place at a new school and, where applicable, any review by the Local Authority of a statement of the child's special educational needs;
(3) any health care steps, including assessment by a paediatrician or other specialist;
(4) any review of Local Authority plans for the child, including any plans for permanence through adoption, Special Guardianship or placement with parents or relatives;
(5) any change or proposed change of the child's placement; or
(6) any significant change in the child's social or family circumstances.
To identify the Timetable for the Child, the applicant is required to provide the information needed about the significant steps in the child's life in the Application Form and the social work statement and to update this information regularly taking into account information received from others involved in the child's life such as the parties, members of the child's family, the person who is caring for the child, the children's guardian and the child's key social worker.
Where more than one child is the subject of the proceedings, the court should consider and will set a Timetable for the Child for each child. The children may not all have the same timetable, and the court will consider the appropriate progress of the proceedings in relation to each child.
Where there are parallel care proceedings and criminal proceedings against a person connected with the child for a serious offence against the child, linked directions hearings should where practicable take place as the case progresses. The timing of the proceedings in a linked care and criminal case should appear in the Timetable for the Child. The aim of resolving the proceedings within 26 weeks applies unless a longer timetable has been set by the court in order to resolve the proceedings justly. In these proceedings, early disclosure and listing of hearings is necessary.
Extensions to the timetable for proceedings
The court is required to draw up a timetable for proceedings with a view to disposing of the application without delay and with the aim of doing so within 26 weeks. If proceedings can be resolved earlier, then they should be. A standard timetable and process is expected to be followed in respect of the giving of standard directions on issue and allocation and other matters which should be carried out by the court on issue, including setting and giving directions for the Case Management Hearing.
Having regard to the circumstances of the particular case, the court may consider that it is necessary to extend the time by which the proceedings are intended to be resolved beyond 26 weeks to enable the court to resolve the proceedings justly. When making this decision, the court is to take account of the guidance that extensions are not to be granted routinely and are to be seen as requiring specific justification. The decision and reason(s) for extending a case should be recorded in writing (in the Case Management Order) and orally stated in court, so that all parties are aware of the reasons for delay in the case. The Case Management Orders must contain a record of this information, as well as the impact of the court's decision on the welfare of the child.
The court may extend the period within which proceedings are intended to be resolved on its own initiative or on application. Applications for an extension should, wherever possible, only be made so that they are considered at any hearing for which a date has been fixed or for which a date is about to be fixed. Where a date for a hearing has been fixed, a party who wishes to make an application at that hearing but does not have sufficient time to file an application notice should as soon as possible inform the court (if possible in writing) and, if possible, the other parties of the nature of the application and the reason for it. The party should then make the application orally at the hearing.
If the court agrees an extension is necessary, the intention is that an initial extension to the time limit may be granted for up to eight weeks (or less if directed) in order to resolve the case justly, meaning that the maximum time limit for proceedings will be 34 weeks. If more time is necessary, in order to resolve the proceedings justly, a further extension of up to eight weeks may be agreed by the court. There is no limit on the number of extensions that may be granted in a particular case.
If the court considers that the timetable for the proceedings will require an extension beyond the next eight week period in order to resolve the proceedings justly, the Case Management Order should –
(1) state the reason(s) why it is necessary to have a further extension;
(2) fix the date of the next effective hearing (which might be in a period shorter than a further eight weeks); and
(3) indicate whether it is appropriate for the next application for an extension of the timetable to be considered on paper.
The expectation is that, subject to paragraph 6.5, extensions should be considered at a hearing and that a court will not approve proposals for the management of a case under FPR 12.15 where the consequence of those proposals is that the case is unlikely to be resolved within 26 weeks or other period for the time being allowed for resolution of the proceedings. In accordance with FPR 4.1(3)(e), the court may hold a hearing and receive evidence by telephone or by using any other method of direct oral communication. When deciding whether to extend the timetable, the court must have regard to the impact of any ensuing timetable revision on the welfare of the child.
In this Practice Direction –
‘Allocation Proposal Form’ is the proposal in the prescribed form referred to in any Guidance issued by the President from time to time on prescribed templates and orders;
‘Care Plan’ means a ‘section 31A plan’ referred to in section 31A of the 1989 Act;
‘Case Analysis’ means a written or, if there is insufficient time for a written, an oral outline of the case from the perspective of the child's best interests prepared by the children's guardian or Welsh family proceedings officer for the CMH or FCMH (where one is necessary) and IRH or as otherwise directed by the court, incorporating an analysis of the key issues that need to be resolved in the case including –
(a) a threshold analysis;
(b) a case management analysis, including an analysis of the timetable for the proceedings, an analysis of the Timetable for the Child and the evidence which any party proposes is necessary to resolve the issues;
(c) a parenting capacity analysis;
(d) a child impact analysis, including an analysis of the ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child and the impact on the welfare of the child of any application to adjourn a hearing or extend the timetable for the proceedings; and
(e) an early permanence analysis including an analysis of the proposed placements and contact framework;
‘Case Management Order’ is the prescribed form of order referred to in any Guidance issued by the President from time to time on prescribed templates and orders;
‘Day’ means ‘business day’;
‘Experts Practice Directions’ mean –
(a) Practice Direction 25A (Experts – Emergencies and Pre Proceedings Instructions);
(b) Practice Direction 25B (The Duties of An Expert, The Expert's Report and Arrangements For An Expert To Attend Court);
(c) Practice Direction 25C (Children's Proceedings - The Use Of Single Joint Experts and The Process Leading to An Expert Being Instructed or Expert Evidence Being Put Before the Court);
(d) Practice Direction 25E (Discussions Between Experts in Family Proceedings).
‘Genogram’ means a family tree, setting out in diagrammatic form the child's family and extended family members and their relationship with the child;
‘Index of Checklist Documents’ means a list of Checklist Documents referred to in the Public Law Outline Pre-Proceedings Checklist which is divided into two parts with Part A being the documents referred to in column 2, paragraph (a) of the Pre- Proceedings Checklist and Part B being those referred to in column 2, paragraph (b) of the Pre-proceedings Checklist;
‘Letter Before Proceedings’ means any letter from the Local Authority containing written notification to the parents and others with parental responsibility for the child of the Local Authority's plan to apply to court for a care or supervision order and any related subsequent correspondence confirming the Local Authority's position;
‘Local Authority Case Summary’ means a document prepared by the Local Authority legal representative for each case management hearing in the form referred to in any Guidance issued by the President from time to time on prescribed templates and orders;
‘Parents' Response’ means a document from either or both of the parents containing –
(a) in no more than two pages, the parents' response to the Threshold Statement, and
(b) the parents' placement proposals including the identity of all relatives and friends they propose be considered by the court;
‘Section 7 report’ means any report under section 7 of the 1989 Act;
‘Section 37 report’ means any report by the Local Authority to the court as a result of a direction under section 37 of the 1989 Act;
‘Social Work Chronology’ means a schedule containing –
(a) a succinct summary of the significant dates and events in the child's life in chronological order- a running record up to the issue of the proceedings;
‘Social Work Statement’ means a statement prepared by the Local Authority limited to the following evidence –
(a) The order sought;
(b) Succinct summary of reasons with reference as appropriate to the Welfare Checklist;
(c) Family members and relationships especially the primary carers and significant adults/other children;
(e) Precipitating events;
(f) Background circumstances;
(i) summary of children's services involvement cross-referenced to the chronology;
(ii) previous court orders and emergency steps;
(iii) previous assessments;
(g) Summary of significant harm and or likelihood of significant harm which the LA will seek to establish by evidence or concession;
(h) Assessment of child's needs;
(i) Assessment of parental capacity to meet needs;
(j) Analysis of why there is a gap between parental capacity and the child's needs;
(k) Assessment of other significant adults who may be carers;
(l) Wishes and feelings of the child(ren);
(m) Timetable for the Child;
(n) Delay and timetable for the proceedings;
Early permanence and contact
(o) Parallel planning;
(p) Placement options;
(q) Contact framework;
(r) Evidence and assessments necessary and outstanding;
(s) Case management proposals;
‘Standard Directions on Issue and Allocation’ means directions given by the court on issue and upon allocation and/or transfer in the prescribed form referred to in any Guidance issued by the President from time to time on prescribed templates and orders;
‘Threshold Statement’ means a written outline by the legal representative of the LA of the facts which the LA will seek to establish by evidence or concession to satisfy the threshold criteria under s31(2) of the 1989 Act limited to no more than 2 pages;