PRACTICE DIRECTION 49A – APPLICATIONS UNDER THE COMPANIES ACTS AND RELATED LEGISLATION
This Practice Direction supplements CPR Part 49
Section I – General
Definitions
1 In this practice direction –
‘the 1985 Act’ means the Companies Act 19851;
‘the 2006 Act’ means the Companies Act 20062;
‘the CJPA’ means the Criminal Justice and Police Act 20013;
‘the EC Regulation’ means Council Regulation (EC) No. 2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European Company (SE)4;
‘Part VII FSMA’ means Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 20005;
‘the Cross-Border Mergers Regulations’ means the Companies (Cross-Border Mergers) Regulations 20076.
Application of this practice direction
2 This practice direction applies to proceedings under –
(a) the 1985 Act;
(b) the 2006 Act (except proceedings under Chapter 1 of Part 11 or Part 30 of that Act);
(c) section 59 of the CJPA;
(d) Articles 22, 25 and 26 of the EC Regulation;
(e) Part VII FSMA; and
(f) the Cross-Border Mergers Regulations.
(Part 19 and Practice Direction 19C contain provisions about proceedings under Chapter 1 of Part 11 of the 2006 Act (derivative claims).
Application of this practice direction to certain proceedings in relation to limited liability partnerships
3 This practice direction applies to proceedings under the 1985 Act and 2006 Act as applied to limited liability partnerships by regulations made under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000.
Title of documents
4
(1) The claim form in proceedings under the 1985 Act, the 2006 Act, Part VII FSMA, the EC Regulation or the Cross-Border Mergers Regulations, and any application, affidavit, witness statement, notice or other document in such proceedings, must be entitled ‘In the matter of [the name of the company in question] and in the matter of [the relevant law]’, where ‘[the relevant law]’ means ‘the Companies Act 1985’, ‘the Companies Act 2006’, ‘Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000’, ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European Company (SE)’ or ‘the Companies (Cross-Border Merger) Regulations 2007’, as the case may be.
Starting proceedings and notification of application made
5
(1) Proceedings to which this practice direction applies must be started by a Part 8 claim form –
(a) unless a provision of this or another practice direction provides otherwise, but
(b) subject to any modification of that procedure by this or any other practice direction.
(2) The claim form –
(a) will, where issued in the High Court, be issued out of the Companies Court or a Chancery district registry; or
(b) will, where issued in a County Court hearing centre, be issued out of a county court office.
(3) Where this practice direction requires a party to proceedings to notify another person of an application, such notification must, unless the court orders otherwise, be given by sending to that other person a copy of the claim form as soon as reasonably practicable after the claim form has been issued.
Section II – Particular applications under the 2006 Act
References to provisions of the 2006 Act in this Section
6 In this Section, a reference to a section by number, not otherwise identified, is to the section so numbered in the 2006 Act.
Company generally to be made a party to a claim under the 2006 Act
7
(1) Where in a claim under the 2006 Act the company concerned is not the claimant, the company is to be made a defendant to the claim unless –
(a) any other enactment, the CPR or this or another practice direction makes a different provision; or
(b) the court orders otherwise.
(2) Where an application is made in the course of proceedings to which the company is or is required to be a defendant, the company must be made a respondent to the application unless –
(a) any other enactment, the CPR or this or another practice direction makes a different provision; or
(b) the court orders otherwise.
Applications under section 295 (Application not to circulate members’ statement) or section 317 (Application not to circulate members’ statement)
Proceedings under section 370 (Unauthorised donations – enforcement of directors’ liabilities by shareholder action)
11 Proceedings to enforce a director’s liability under section 370 must be started by a Part 7 claim form.
Proceedings under Parts 26 and 27 of the 2006 Act (Applications to sanction a compromise or arrangement)
15
(1) This paragraph applies to an application for an order under Parts 26 and 27 of the 2006 Act to sanction a compromise or arrangement.
(2) Where the application is made by the company concerned, or by a liquidator or administrator of the company, there need be no defendant to the claim unless the court so orders.
(3) The claim form must be supported by written evidence, including –
(a) statutory information about the company; and
(b) the terms of the proposed compromise or arrangement.
(4) The claim form must seek –
(a) directions for convening a meeting of creditors or members or both, as the case requires;
(b) the sanction of the court to the compromise or arrangement, if it is approved at the meeting or meetings, and a direction for a further hearing for that purpose; and
(c) a direction that the claimant files a copy of a report to the court by the chairman of the meeting or of each meeting.
Proceedings under section 955 (Takeovers – enforcement by the court)
16 Proceedings for an order under section 955 must be started by a Part 7 claim form.
Proceedings under section 968 (Takeovers – effect on contractual restrictions)
17 Proceedings to recover compensation under section 968(6) must be started by a Part 7 claim form.
Section III – Other applications
Applications under the EC Regulation – Article 25
19
(1) In this paragraph and paragraphs 20 and 21 –
(a) a reference to an Article by number is a reference to the Article so numbered in the EC Regulation; and
(b) ‘SE’ means a European public limited-liability company (Societas Europaea) within the meaning of the EC Regulation.
(1A) Any document that is filed with the court must, if not in English, be accompanied by a translation of that document into English –
(a) certified by a notary public or other qualified person; or
(b) accompanied by written evidence confirming that the translation is accurate.
(2) An application for a certificate under Article 25(2) –
(a) must set out the pre-merger acts and formalities applicable to the applicant company;
(b) must be accompanied by evidence that those acts and formalities have been completed; and
(c) must be accompanied by copies of –
(i) the draft terms of merger, as provided for in Article 20;
(ii) the entry in the London Gazette containing the particulars specified in Article 21;
(iii) a directors’ report;
(iv) an expert’s report; and
(v) the resolution of the applicant company approving the draft terms of merger in accordance with Article 23.
(3) In paragraph (2)(c) –
‘directors’ report’ in relation to a company means a report by the directors of the company containing the information required by section 908 of the 2006 Act;
‘expert's report’ in relation to a company means a report to the members of the company drawn up in accordance with –
(a) section 909 of the 2006 Act; or
(b) Article 22.
(4) There need be no defendant to the application.
Applications under the EC Regulation – Article 22 (Appointment of an independent expert)
20
(1) An application under Article 22 for the appointment of an independent expert must be made –
(a) where the application is made at the same time as or after the application under Article 25(2) for the approval of the pre-merger acts and formalities has been filed with the court, by application notice pursuant to Part 23; or
(b) where no application under Article 25(2) has been made, by a Part 8 claim form.
(2) The application (whether by a claim form or application notice, as the case may be) must be accompanied by evidence in support of the application.
Applications under the EC Regulation – Article 26
21
(1) Where under Article 26(2) a merging company is required to submit a certificate to the High Court, that company must, if no other merging company has begun proceedings under Article 26, start such proceedings by way of a Part 8 claim form.
(2) There need be no defendant to the claim.
(3) The claim form –
(a) must name the SE and all of the merging companies;
(b) must be accompanied by the documents referred to in sub-paragraph (5); and
(c) must be served on each of the other merging companies.
(4) Where under Article 26(2) a merging company is required to submit a certificate to the High Court, and proceedings under Article 26 have already been begun, the company –
(a) must, not more than 14 days after service on it of the claim form, file an acknowledgment of service and serve it on each of the other merging companies; and
(b) must file the documents, in relation to each merging company, referred to in sub-paragraph (5) within the time limit specified in Article 26(2), and serve copies of them on each of the other merging companies.
(5) The documents in relation to each merging company are –
(a) the certificate issued under Article 25(2) in respect of the company;
(b) a copy of the draft terms of merger approved by the company;
(c) evidence that arrangements for employee involvement have been determined by the company pursuant to Council Directive 2001/86/EC of 8 October 2001 supplementing the Statute for a European company with regard to the involvement of employees; and
(d) evidence that the SE has been formed in accordance with Article 26(4).
Applications under the Cross-Border Mergers Regulations
Application for approval of pre-merger requirements
23
(1) This paragraph applies to an application under regulation 6.
(2) There need be no defendant to the application.
(3) The application must –
(a) set out the pre-merger acts and formalities required by regulations 7 to 10 and 12 to 15 applicable to the applicant company; and
(b) be accompanied by evidence that those acts and formalities have been completed properly.
(4) Where an application under regulation 11 to summon a meeting of creditors has been made, the court will not determine the application under regulation 6 to approve the pre-merger requirements until the result of the meeting is known.
(5) Where the court makes an order certifying that all pre-merger acts and formalities have been completed properly, the applicant must draw up the order and file it no later than 7 days after the date on which the order was made so that it can be sealed(GL) by the court. The court will seal(GL) and return the order to the applicant within 15 days of receipt.
Application for appointment of independent expert or to summon a meeting of members or creditors
24.
(1) This paragraph applies to –
(a) an application for the appointment of an independent expert under regulation 9;
(b) an application under regulation 11 for an order to summon a meeting of members or creditors or both.
(2) The application must be made –
(a) where the application is made at the same time as or after the application for approval of the pre-merger acts and formalities under regulation 6 has been filed with the court, by application notice pursuant to Part 23; or
(b) where no application under regulation 6 has been made, by a Part 8 claim form.
(3) The application (whether by claim form or application notice, as the case may be) must be accompanied by evidence in support of the application.
Application for the approval of the completion of the merger
25.
(1) This paragraph applies to an application under regulation 16.
(2) The application must be made by a Part 8 claim form.
(3) There need be no defendant to the application.
(4) The claim form must be accompanied by –
(a) the documents referred to in regulation 16(1)(b), (c) and (e);
(b) where appropriate, evidence that regulation 16(1)(f) has been complied with; and
(c) such other evidence as may be required to enable the court to decide the application.
(5) Where the court makes an order under regulation 16 approving the merger, it will fix a date on which the consequences of the merger are to take effect.
Applications under section 59 of the CJPA
26.
(1) In sub-paragraphs (2) to (8) –
(a) a reference to a section by number, not otherwise identified, is a reference to the section so numbered in the CJPA; and
(b) references to a relevant interest in property have the same meaning as in section 59 of the CJPA.
(2) This paragraph applies to applications under section 59 in respect of property seized in exercise of the power conferred by section 448(3) of the 1985 Act (including any additional powers of seizure conferred by section 50 that are exercisable by reference to that power).
(3) The application must be supported by evidence –
(a) that the claimant has a relevant interest in the property to which the application relates; and
(b) in the case of an application under section 59(2), that one or more of the grounds set out in section 59(3) is satisfied in relation to the property.
(4) Where the claimant has a relevant interest in the property, the defendants to the claim are to be –
(a) the person in possession of the property; and
(b) any other person who appears to have a relevant interest in the property.
(5) Where the claimant is in possession of the property, the defendants are to be –
(a) the person from whom the property was seized; and
(b) any other person who appears to have a relevant interest in the property.
(6) In the case of an application for the return of seized property, the claimant must serve a copy of the claim form and the claimant’s evidence in support of it on the person specified, by the notice given under section 52 when the property was seized, as the person to whom notice of such an application should be given.
(7) If the claimant knows the identity of the person who seized the property, the claimant must also notify that person of the application.
(8) When the court issues the claim form it will fix a date for the hearing.
Section IV – Conduct of proceedings
Reduction of capital – evidence
27.
In the case of an application to confirm a reduction in capital, if any shares were issued otherwise than for cash –
Section V – Miscellaneous
Service of documents
28.
The parties are responsible for service of documents in proceedings to which this practice direction applies.