PRACTICE DIRECTION 36N - PILOT SCHEME: PROCEDURE FOR ONLINE FILING AND PROGRESSION OF CERTAIN APPLICATIONS FOR A FINANCIAL REMEDY IN CONNECTION WITH CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS FOR A MATRIMONIAL ORDER

This Practice Direction supplements rule 36.2 FPR (Transitional arrangements and pilot schemes).

TitleNumber
Scope and interpretationPara. 1
Purpose of this Pilot SchemePara. 2
Modification or disapplication of the FPR and Practice Directions during the operation of the Pilot SchemePara. 3
Modification of Part 3 FPRPara. 4
Modification of Part 5 FPRPara. 5
Modification of Part 9 FPRPara. 6
Modification of Part 29 FPRPara. 7
Modification of Practice Direction 3APara. 8
Disapplication of Practice Direction 5BPara. 9
Modification of Practice Direction 6APara. 10
Modification of Practice Direction 9APara. 11

1. Scope and interpretation

1.1 This Practice Direction is made under rule 36.2 FPR and sets up a Pilot Scheme to allow for certain applications for a financial remedy in connection with certain proceedings for a matrimonial order to be filed and progressed via a HMCTS online application system.

1.2 This Practice Direction comes into force on 27th May 2019.

1.3 This Pilot Scheme applies to applications where all of the following conditions are met:

(a) subject to the exception in paragraph 1.4, the application is-

(i)  for a financial remedy in connection with an application for a matrimonial order which is a decree of divorce made under section 1 of the 1973 Act; or

(ii) a notice of intention to proceed with an application for a financial remedy that was made in an application for a matrimonial order which is a decree of divorce made under section 1 of the 1973 Act;

(b) the application is not for a consent order;

(c) either –

(i) the applicant is legally represented; or

(ii) the applicant and the respondent are legally represented;

(d) access by the party’s legal representative to the online system for creating, starting or progressing such applications is permitted;

(e) the application is started in the family court; and

(e) the application is made in the period commencing on 27th May 2019 and ending on 30 September 2021.

1.4 The exception referred to in paragraph 1.3 is where the application is for-

(a) an order for maintenance pending suit; or

(b) a variation order in respect of a financial remedy order that was not made as a result of an application made via the online system.

1.5 In this Practice Direction, “the online system” means Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service’s online system to allow for specified stages in financial remedy proceedings to be dealt with online.

2. Purpose of this Pilot Scheme

2.1 The purpose of this Pilot Scheme is to assess new practices and procedures to allow for certain applications for a financial remedy, made in connection with certain applications for a matrimonial order, to be created, started and progressed via an online system.

2.2  It is intended that future Practice Directions will establish other Pilot Schemes which will allow for other specified stages in specified financial remedy proceedings to take place via the online system.

2.3 For the avoidance of doubt-

(a) it should not be assumed that all stages of an application will always be able to be dealt with on the online system or that all legal representatives of parties will have access to the online system. This is because Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service will be gradually rolling out new stages and features on the online system. Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service will indicate via the online system who can access the online system, and which stages in proceedings can be dealt with on the online system, at any point in time; and

(b) filing a document via the online system does not mean that service of that document has been effected.

3. Modification or disapplication of the FPR and Practice Directions during the operation of the Pilot Scheme

3.1 During the operation of the Pilot Scheme, the FPR and the Practice Directions supporting the FPR will apply in respect of the applicant to cases falling within the Pilot Scheme as modified, or disapplied, by paragraphs 3A.1 to 11.2.

Modification of Part 2 FPR

3A.1 In rule 2.3(1), the definition of “filing” is modified by inserting after “office”-

“or, where the Pilot Scheme referred to in Practice Direction 36N applies, by uploading the document on, or submitting the document via, the online system referred to in that Practice Direction”.

4. Modification of Part 3 FPR

4.1 For rule 3.7 substitute-

“3.7Where the Pilot Scheme referred to in Practice Direction 36N applies, the application must include from the prospective applicant -

(a) confirmation that the prospective applicant has attended a MIAM;

(b) a claim that one of the MIAM exemptions applies; or

(c) confirmation that a mediator’s exemption applies.”.

4.2 In rule 3.8(2) for “confirms in the relevant form” substitute “has provided signed confirmation”.

5. Modification of Part 5 FPR

5.1 For rule 5.1, substitute-

“5.1 Where the Pilot Scheme referred to in Practice Direction 36N applies-

(a) the applicant must complete all sections of the online application; and

(b) the applicant and the respondent must provide all the information, including any additional documents, that the online application system referred to in that Practice Direction requires, or that the court requires, in a manner-

(i) specified by the online application system;

(ii) specified in guidance relating to the online application system; or

(iii) required by the court.

5.2 Omit rule 5.2.

6. Modification of Part 9 FPR

6.1 After rule 9.9B insert-

“Pilot Scheme cases: filing of documents by the Applicant

9.9C(1)  In this rule, “document” means anything in which information of any description is recorded.

(2)  Where-

(a) the Pilot Scheme referred to in Practice Direction 36N applies;

(b) the court, a rule in this Part or a provision in Practice Direction 9A requires a party to file a document with the court; and

(c) the court or the online system requires that that document be filed with the court in a specified manner;

the party must comply with that requirement by filing the document in the specified manner.

(See also Practice Direction 9A.) ”.

6.2 In rule 9.17, after paragraph (5) insert-

“(5A) Where the Pilot Scheme referred to in Practice Direction 36N applies and a document has been filed in a manner specified by the online system referred to in that Practice Direction, paragraph (5) does not apply.

(5B) Where paragraph (5A) applies, the document will not be retained on the online system or on the court file following the conclusion of the FDR appointment.”.

6.3 For rule 9.26(1)(a) substitute-

“(a) the applicant must file a draft of the order in the terms sought, which must be signed by both parties; and”.

7. Modification of Part 29 FPR

7.1 After rule 29.13(1) insert-

“(1A) Where the Pilot Scheme referred to in Practice Direction 36N applies, service on a party under paragraph (1) or otherwise may be effected by the court sending the party an email, to the address given for service in accordance with Practice Direction 6A, containing a weblink from which the order may be accessed and downloaded.”.

8. Modification of Practice Direction 3A

8.1 For paragraph 6 substitute-

“6.Where the Pilot Scheme referred to in Practice Direction 36N applies, the application must include from the applicant one of the following-

(a) confirmation that the applicant has attended a MIAM, including the date attended, the name of the authorised family mediator (and/or Family Mediation Service) and their FMC registration number;

(b) a claim that one of the MIAM exemptions applies; or

(c) confirmation that a mediator’s exemption applies.”.

8.2 After paragraph 6 insert-

“6A.An applicant who provides confirmation or makes a claim in accordance with paragraph 6(a), (b) or (c) above is not required to provide any supporting evidence with their application, but should bring any supporting evidence (including where applicable the signed confirmation by the authorised family mediator that a mediator’s exemption applies) to the first appointment.”.

8.3 Omit paragraphs 14 and 15.

8.4 In paragraph 18 for “on the relevant form” substitute “in the relevant section of the online system”.

8.5 In paragraph 34, for the words after “MIAM exemption” substitute “and signed confirmation should then be returned to the applicant.”.

9. Disapplication of Practice Direction 5B

9.1 Omitted

10. Modification of Practice Direction 6A

10.1 In paragraph 4.2(b)-

(a) in paragraph (iii) for “; or” substitute “;”;

(b) in paragraph (iv) for the full-stop substitute “; or”; and

(c) after paragraph (iv) insert-

“(v) confirmation given, by the party to be served, within the online system referred to in Practice Direction 36N, that that applicant is willing to accept service by email and stating the email address for such service.”.

11. Modification of Practice Direction 9A

11.1 After paragraph 2.1, insert-

“Application for a financial remedy received via the online system: timing

2A.1 An application for a financial remedy that is submitted via the online system referred to in Practice Direction 36N is lodged with the court on the date and at the time that HMCTS software records the application as received, provided that the application is subsequently issued by the court.

2A.1A A document, other than an application, that is submitted via the online system referred to in Practice Direction 36N is filed with or otherwise received by the court on the date and at the time that HMCTS software records the document as received.”; and

(b) in the inserted paragraph 2B.1 of Practice Direction 9A-

(i) for “documents that the applicant” substitute “documents that a party”; and

(ii) after “paragraph 5.2” insert “of Practice Direction 9A

2A.2  When an application for a financial remedy to which the Pilot Scheme referred to in Practice Direction 36N applies is received via the online system referred to in that Practice Direction, an acknowledgement of receipt will automatically be sent to the email address given as the address for service in the online system. This acknowledgement of receipt does not constitute a notice that the application has been issued.

Application for a financial remedy received via the online system: filing of subsequent documents (etc) by the applicant

2B.1 Rule 9.9C makes provision in relation to cases to which the Pilot Scheme referred to in Practice Direction 36N applies. The term “document” is defined widely in the rule. The reference in rule 9.9C to a “document” includes all statements, evidence, notices and other documents that the applicant may be required to file in accordance with a direction or order of the court, a rule in Part 9 of the FPR or a provision of this Practice Direction, to include:

rule 9.14 - a financial statement, documents accompanying the financial statement, a statement of issues, chronology, questionnaire, notice of readiness, confirmation of who has been served;

rule 9.15 – further documents to be filed, as directed by the court at the first appointment;

rule 9.16 – documents to be filed, as directed by the court after the first appointment;

rule 9.17(3) – details of offers and proposals;

rule 9.17(9) – evidence directed at the conclusion of an FDR appointment to be filed;

rule 9.18(2)(c)(iii) – certificate of service;

rule 9.19(1), (2) and (3) – financial statement and specified supporting documents;

rule 9.20(3)(a) and (b) – further evidence or documents to be filed, as directed by the court at the first hearing;

rule 9.28(1) – an open statement which sets out concise details, including the amounts involved, of the orders which the applicant proposes to ask the court to make;

paragraph 4.1 of this Practice Direction – a summary of the case agreed between the parties, a schedule of assets agreed between the parties and details of any directions that they seek, including, where appropriate, the name of any expert they wish to be appointed; and

paragraph 5.2 – documents or information filed by way of reply to a questionnaire, where the court has directed that these be filed with the court.”.

11.2 For paragraph 7.1 substitute-

“7.1  Rule 9.26(1)(a) is considered to be properly complied with if the draft order is signed by solicitors on record as acting for a party. However, where the consent order applied for contains undertakings, it should be signed by the party giving the undertakings as well as by that party’s solicitor.

(Provision relating to the enforcement of undertakings is contained in Practice Direction 33A supplementing Part 33 of the FPR.)

Contact

Get email alerts
Find a form
Find a court form