PART 54 - JUDICIAL REVIEW AND STATUTORY REVIEW

Contents of this Part

Title Number
I JUDICIAL REVIEW  
Scope and interpretation Rule 54.1
Who may exercise the powers of the High Court Rule 54.1A
When this Section must be used Rule 54.2
When this Section may be used Rule 54.3
Permission required Rule 54.4
Time limit for filing claim form Rule 54.5
Claim form Rule 54.6
Service of claim form Rule 54.7
Judicial review of decisions of the Upper Tribunal Rule 54.7A
Acknowledgment of service Rule 54.8
Failure to file acknowledgment of service Rule 54.9
Permission given Rule 54.10
Service of order giving or refusing permission Rule 54.11
Permission decision where court requires a hearing Rule 54.11A
Permission decision without a hearing Rule 54.12
Defendant etc. may not apply to set aside Rule 54.13
Response Rule 54.14
Where claimant seeks to rely on additional grounds Rule 54.15
Evidence Rule 54.16
Court's powers to hear any person Rule 54.17
Judicial review may be decided without a hearing Rule 54.18
Court's powers in respect of quashing orders Rule 54.19
Transfer Rule Rule 54.20
II PLANNING COURT  
General Rule 54.21
Specialist list Rule 54.22
Application of the Civil Procedure Rules Rule 54.23
Further provision about Planning Court claims Rule 54.24
III ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT ACT 2021 
Scope and interpretationRule 54.25
Who may exercise the powers of the High CourtRule 54.26
When this Section must be usedRule 54.27
Time limit for filing claim formRule 54.28
Claim formRule 54.29
Service of claim formRule 54.30
Acknowledgment of serviceRule 54.31
Detailed grounds and evidenceRule 54.32
Failure to file acknowledgment of serviceRule 54.33
Where claimant seeks to rely on additional groundsRule 54.34
Other procedural rulesRule 54.35

I JUDICIAL REVIEW

Scope and interpretation

54.1

(1) This Section of this Part contains rules about judicial review.

(2) In this Section –

(a) a ‘claim for judicial review’ means a claim to review the lawfulness of –

(i) an enactment; or

(ii) a decision, action or failure to act in relation to the exercise of a public function.

(b) revoked

(c) revoked

(d) revoked

(e) ‘the judicial review procedure’ means the Part 8 procedure as modified by this Section;

(f) ‘interested party’ means any person (other than the claimant and defendant) who is directly affected by the claim; and

(g) ‘court’ means the High Court, unless otherwise stated.

(Rule 8.1(6)(b) provides that a rule or practice direction may, in relation to a specified type of proceedings, disapply or modify any of the rules set out in Part 8 as they apply to those proceedings)

Back to top

Who may exercise the powers of the High Court

54.1A

(1) A court officer assigned to the Administrative Court office who is –

(a) a barrister,

(b) a solicitor; or

(c)a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives or a CILEX lawyer,

may exercise the jurisdiction of the High Court with regard to the matters set out in paragraph (2) with the consent of the President of the King's Bench Division.

(2) The matters referred to in paragraph (1) are –

(a) any matter incidental to any proceedings in the High Court;

(b) any other matter where there is no substantial dispute between the parties; and

(c) the dismissal of an appeal or application where a party has failed to comply with any order, rule or practice direction.

(3) A court officer may not decide an application for –

(a) permission to bring judicial review proceedings;

(b) an injunction;

(c) a stay of any proceedings, other than a temporary stay of any order or decision of the lower court over a period when the High Court is not sitting or cannot conveniently be convened, unless the parties seek a stay by consent.

(4) Decisions of a court officer may be made without a hearing.

(5) A party may request any decision of a court officer to be reviewed by a judge of the High Court.

(6) At the request of a party, a hearing will be held to reconsider a decision of a court officer, made without a hearing.

(7) A request under paragraph (5) or (6) must be filed within 7 days after the party is served with notice of the decision.

Back to top

When this Section must be used

54.2 The judicial review procedure must be used in a claim for judicial review where the claimant is seeking –

(a) a mandatory order;

(b) a prohibiting order;

(c) a quashing order; or

(d) an injunction under section 30 of the Supreme Court Act 19811 (restraining a person from acting in any office in which he is not entitled to act).

Back to top

When this Section may be used

54.3

(1) The judicial review procedure may be used in a claim for judicial review where the claimant is seeking –

(a) a declaration; or

(b) an injunction(GL).

(Section 31(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 sets out the circumstances in which the court may grant a declaration or injunction in a claim for judicial review)

(Where the claimant is seeking a declaration or injunction in addition to one of the remedies listed in rule 54.2, the judicial review procedure must be used)

(2) A claim for judicial review may include a claim for damages, restitution or the recovery of a sum due but may not seek such a remedy alone.

(Section 31(4) of the Supreme Court Act sets out the circumstances in which the court may award damages, restitution or the recovery of a sum due on a claim for judicial review)

Back to top

Permission required

54.4 The court’s permission to proceed is required in a claim for judicial review whether started under this Section or transferred to the Administrative Court.

Back to top

Time limit for filing claim form

54.5

(A1) In this rule —

'the planning acts' has the same meaning as in section 336 of the Town and Country Planning Act 19902;

'decision governed by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015' means any decision the legality of which is or may be affected by a duty owed to an economic operator by virtue of regulations 89 or 90 of those Regulations (and for this purpose it does not matter that the claimant is not an economic operator); and

'economic operator' has the same meaning as in regulation 2(1) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

(1) The claim form must be filed –

(a) promptly; and

(b) in any event not later than 3 months after the grounds to make the claim first arose.

(2) The time limits in this rule may not be extended by agreement between the parties.

(3) This rule does not apply when any other enactment specifies a shorter time limit for making the claim for judicial review.

(4) Paragraph (1) does not apply in the cases specified in paragraphs (5) and (6).

(5) Where the application for judicial review relates to a decision made by the Secretary of State or local planning authority under the planning acts, the claim form must be filed not later than six weeks after the grounds to make the claim first arose.

(6) Where the application for judicial review relates to a decision governed by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, the claim form must be filed within the time within which an economic operator would have been required by regulation 92(2) of those Regulations (and disregarding the rest of that regulation) to start any proceedings under those Regulations in respect of that decision.

Back to top

Claim form

54.6

(1) In addition to the matters set out in rule 8.2 (contents of the claim form) the claimant must also state –

(a) the name and address of any person he considers to be an interested party;

(b) that he is requesting permission to proceed with a claim for judicial review; and

(c) any remedy (including any interim remedy) he is claiming; and

(d) where appropriate, the grounds on which it is contended that the claim is an Aarhus Convention claim.

(Rules 45.41 to 45.44 make provision about costs in Aarhus Convention claims.)

(Part 25 sets out how to apply for an interim remedy)

(2) The claim form must be accompanied by the documents required by Practice Direction 54A.

Back to top

Service of claim form

54.7

The claim form must be served on –

(a) the defendant; and

(b) unless the court otherwise directs, any person the claimant considers to be an interested party,

within 7 days after the date of issue.

Back to top

Judicial review of decisions of the Upper Tribunal

54.7A

(1) Where the Upper Tribunal has refused permission to appeal against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal, no application for judicial review of the Upper Tribunal’s decision, or which relates to the First-tier Tribunal’s decision, may be made except where the question in the judicial review application is—

(a) whether the application for permission to appeal was validly made to the Upper Tribunal;

(b) whether the Upper Tribunal when refusing permission to appeal was properly constituted; or

(c) whether the Upper Tribunal is acting or has acted in bad faith or in such a procedurally defective way as amounts to a fundamental breach of the principles of natural justice.

(2) The claim form and the supporting documents must be filed no later than 16 days after the date on which notice of the Upper Tribunal’s decision was sent to the applicant.

Back to top

Acknowledgment of service

54.8

(1) Any person served with the claim form who wishes to take part in the judicial review must file an acknowledgment of service in the relevant practice form in accordance with the following provisions of this rule.

(2) Any acknowledgment of service must be –

(a) filed not more than 21 days after service of the claim form; and

(b) served on –

(i) the claimant; and

(ii) subject to any direction under rule 54.7(b), any other person named in the claim form,

as soon as practicable and, in any event, not later than 7 days after it is filed.

(3) The time limits under this rule may not be extended by agreement between the parties.

(4) The acknowledgment of service –

(a) must –

(i) where the person filing it intends to contest the claim, set out a summary of his grounds for doing so; and

(ia) where the person filing it intends to contest the application for permission on the basis that it is highly likely that the outcome for the claimant would not have been substantially different if the conduct complained of had not occurred, set out a summary of the grounds for doing so; and

(ii) state the name and address of any person the person filing it considers to be an interested party; and

(b) may include or be accompanied by an application for directions.

(5) Rule 10.3(2) does not apply.

(Section 31(3C) of the Senior Courts Act 1981(1) requires the court, where it is asked to do so by the defendant, to consider whether the outcome for the claimant would have been substantially different if the conduct complained of had not occurred.)

Back to top

Failure to file acknowledgment of service

54.9

(1) Where a person served with the claim form has failed to file an acknowledgment of service in accordance with rule 54.8, he –

(a) may not take part in a hearing to decide whether permission should be given unless the court allows him to do so; but

(b) provided he complies with rule 54.14 or any other direction of the court regarding the filing and service of –

(i) detailed grounds for contesting the claim or supporting it on additional grounds; and

(ii) any written evidence,

may take part in the hearing of the judicial review.

(2) Where that person takes part in the hearing of the judicial review, the court may take his failure to file an acknowledgment of service into account when deciding what order to make about costs.

(3) Rule 8.4 does not apply.

Back to top

Permission given

54.10

(1) Where permission to proceed is given the court may also give directions.

(2) Directions under paragraph (1) may include –

(a) a stay(GL) of proceedings to which the claim relates;

(b) directions requiring the proceedings to be heard by a Divisional Court.

Back to top

Service of order giving or refusing permission

54.11

The court will serve –

(a) the order giving or refusing permission; and

(ai) any certificate (if not included in the order) that permission has been granted for reasons of exceptional public interest in accordance with section 31(3F) of the Senior Courts Act 1981; and

(b) any directions,

on –

(i) the claimant;

(ii) the defendant; and

(iii) any other person who filed an acknowledgment of service.

Back to top

Permission decision where court requires a hearing

54.11A

(1) This rule applies where the court wishes to hear submissions on—

(a) whether it is highly likely that the outcome for the claimant would not have been substantially different if the conduct complained of had not occurred; and if so

(b) whether there are reasons of exceptional public interest which make it nevertheless appropriate to give permission.

(2) The court may direct a hearing to determine whether to give permission.

(3) The claimant, defendant and any other person who has filed an acknowledgment of service must be given at least 2 days’ notice of the hearing date.

(4) The court may give directions requiring the proceedings to be heard by a Divisional Court.

(5) The court must give its reasons for giving or refusing permission.

Back to top

Permission decision without a hearing

54.12

(1) This rule applies where the court, without a hearing –

(a) refuses permission to proceed; or

(b) gives permission to proceed –

(i) subject to conditions; or

(ii) on certain grounds only.

(2) The court will serve its reasons for making the decision when it serves the order giving or refusing permission in accordance with rule 54.11.

(3) Subject to paragraph (7), the claimant may not appeal but may request the decision to be reconsidered at a hearing.

(4) A request under paragraph (3) must be filed within 7 days after service of the reasons under paragraph (2).

(5) The claimant, defendant and any other person who has filed an acknowledgment of service will be given at least 2 days’ notice of the hearing date.

(6) The court may give directions requiring the proceedings to be heard by a Divisional Court.

(7) Where the court refuses permission to proceed and records the fact that the application is totally without merit in accordance with rule 23.12, the claimant may not request that decision to be reconsidered at a hearing.

Back to top

Defendant etc. may not apply to set aside(GL)

54.13 Neither the defendant nor any other person served with the claim form may apply to set aside(GL) an order giving permission to proceed.

Back to top

Response

54.14

(1) A defendant and any other person served with the claim form who wishes to contest the claim or support it on additional grounds must file and serve –

(a) detailed grounds for contesting the claim or supporting it on additional grounds; and

(b) any written evidence,

within 35 days after service of the order giving permission.

(2) The following rules do not apply –

(a) rule 8.5 (3) and 8.5 (4)(defendant to file and serve written evidence at the same time as acknowledgment of service); and

(b) rule 8.5 (5) and 8.5(6) (claimant to file and serve any reply within 14 days).

Back to top

Where claimant seeks to rely on additional grounds

54.15 The court’s permission is required if a claimant seeks to rely on grounds other than those for which he has been given permission to proceed.

Back to top

Evidence

54.16

(1) Rule 8.6 (1) does not apply.

(2) No written evidence may be relied on unless –

(a) it has been served in accordance with any –

(i) rule under this Section; or

(ii) direction of the court; or

(b) the court gives permission.

Back to top

Court's powers to hear any person

54.17

(1) Any person may apply for permission –

(a) to file evidence; or

(b) make representations at the hearing of the judicial review.

(2) An application under paragraph (1) should be made promptly.

Back to top

Judicial review may be decided without a hearing

54.18 The court may decide the claim for judicial review without a hearing where all the parties agree.

Back to top

Court's powers in respect of quashing orders

54.19

(1) This rule applies where the court makes a quashing order in respect of the decision to which the claim relates.

(2) The court may –

(a)

(i) remit the matter to the decision-maker; and

(ii) direct it to reconsider the matter and reach a decision in accordance with the judgment of the court; or

(b) in so far as any enactment permits, substitute its own decision for the decision to which the claim relates.

(Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 19814 enables the High Court, subject to certain conditions, to substitute its own decision for the decision in question.)

Back to top

Transfer

54.20 The court may

(a) order a claim to continue as if it had not been started under this Section; and

(b) where it does so, give directions about the future management of the claim.

(Part 30 (transfer) applies to transfers to and from the Administrative Court)

Back to top

II PLANNING COURT

General

54.21

(1) This Section applies to Planning Court claims.

(2) In this Section, 'Planning Court claim' means a judicial review or statutory challenge which —

(a) involves any of the following matters —

(i) planning permission, other development consents, the enforcement of planning control and the enforcement of other statutory schemes;

(ii) applications under the Transport and Works Act 1992;

(iii) wayleaves;

(iv) highways and other rights of way;

(v) compulsory purchase orders;

(vi) village greens;

(vii) European Union environmental legislation and domestic transpositions, including assessments for development consents, habitats, waste and pollution control;

(viii) national, regional or other planning policy documents, statutory or otherwise; or

(ix) any other matter the judge appointed under rule 54.22(2) considers appropriate; and

(b) has been issued or transferred to the Planning Court.

(Part 30 (Transfer) applies to transfers to and from the Planning Court.)

Back to top

Specialist list

54.22

(1) The Planning Court claims form a specialist list.

(2) A judge nominated by the President of the King’s Bench Division will be in charge of the Planning Court specialist list and will be known as the Planning Liaison Judge.

(3) The President of the King’s Bench Division will be responsible for the nomination of specialist planning judges to deal with Planning Court claims which are significant within the meaning of Practice Direction 54D, and of other judges to deal with other Planning Court claims.

Back to top

Application of the Civil Procedure Rules

54.23 These Rules and their practice directions will apply to Planning Court claims unless this section or a practice direction provides otherwise.

Back to top

Further provision about Planning Court claims

54.24 Practice Direction 54D makes further provision about Planning Court claims, in particular about the timescales for determining such claims.

SECTION III – ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT ACT 2021

Scope and interpretation

54.25

(1) This Section contains rules about environmental review.

(2) In this Section—

(a)“claim for environmental review” means a claim made by the Office for Environmental Protection (“OEP”) under section 38 of the Environment Act 2021(1);

(b)“the environmental review procedure” means the Part 8 procedure as modified by this Section;

(c)“interested party” means any person (other than the claimant and defendant) who is directly affected by the claim; and

(d)“court” means the High Court.

Who may exercise the powers of the High Court

54.26

(1) Rule 54.1A (excluding paragraph (3)(a) of the rule) applies to a claim for environmental review.

(2) A claim for environmental review shall be assigned to the Planning Court.

When this Section must be used

54.27

(1) The environmental review procedure must be used where a claim for environmental review is made.

(2) Practice Direction 54E applies to the environmental review procedure.

Time limit for filing claim form

54.28

(1) The claim form must be filed not later than 6 months from the date by which a response to a decision notice was required under section 36(3) of the Environment Act 2021.

(2) The time limit in paragraph (1) may be extended, but only upon application to the court by the claimant and if the court is satisfied that it is reasonable to do so.

Claim form

54.29

(1) In addition to the matters set out in rule 8.2 (contents of the claim form) the claimant must also state—

(a)the name of the public authority, the defendant, against whom the claim for environmental review is brought;

(b)the name and address of any person the claimant considers to be an interested party; and

(c)any remedy (including any interim remedy) sought by the claimant.

(2) The claim form must be accompanied by the documents required by Practice Direction 54E.

Service of claim form

54.30

The claim form must be served on—

(a)the defendant; and

(b)unless the court otherwise directs, any person the claimant considers to be an interested party,

within 7 days after the date of issue.

Acknowledgment of service

54.31

(1) Any person served with the claim form who wishes to take part in the environmental review must file an acknowledgment of service in the relevant practice form in accordance with the following provisions of this rule.

(2) Any acknowledgment of service must be—

(a)filed not more than 35 days after service of the claim form; and

(b)served on—

(i)the claimant; and

(ii)subject to any direction under rule 54.30(b), any other person named in the claim form,

as soon as practicable and, in any event, not later than 7 days after it is filed.

(3) The time limits under this rule may not be extended by agreement between the parties.

(4) The acknowledgment of service—

(a)must state the name and address of any person the person filing it considers to be an interested party; and

(b)may include or be accompanied by an application for directions.

(5) Rule 10.3(2) does not apply.

Detailed grounds and evidence

54.32

(1) A defendant and any other person served with the claim form who wishes to contest the claim or support it on additional grounds must file and serve with the acknowledgement of service—

(a)detailed grounds for contesting the claim or supporting it on additional grounds; and

(b)any written evidence.

Failure to file acknowledgment of service

54.33

(1) Where a person served with the claim form has failed to file an acknowledgment of service in accordance with rule 54.31 or to comply with 54.32, they may not take part in the hearing of the claim unless the court allows them to do so and they comply with rule 54.31 or any other direction of the court regarding the filing and service of—

(a)detailed grounds for contesting the claim or supporting it on additional grounds; and

(b)any written evidence.

(2) Where that person takes part in the hearing of the environmental review, the court may take their failure to file an acknowledgment of service into account when deciding whether an order as to costs should be made.

(3) Rule 8.4 does not apply.

Where claimant seeks to rely on additional grounds

54.34

The court’s permission is required if the claimant seeks to rely on grounds other than those set out in the original claim.

Other procedural rules

54.35

Rules 54.10 and 54.16 – 54.20 shall apply to the environmental review procedure, except that—

(a)references to “permission to proceed” shall be disregarded; and

(b)the reference in rule 54.19 to “the decision to which the claim relates” shall be read as referring to “the matter to which the claim relates.”.
(1)

Back to top

Footnotes

  1. 1981 c.54. Back to text
  2. 1990 c. 8. Back to text
  3. 1981 c.54. Section 31 is amended by section 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (c. 15). Back to text
Ministry of Justice

Contact

Get email alerts
Find a form
Find a court form