Civil Procedure Rules
Error - 69th Update coming into force April 2014
Please note that the amendments to PD3E (substitution of Precedent H) and PD22 Statement of Truth come into force on 22 April 2014 and not 6 April as stated.
Precedent H revised (PDF)
Precedent H revised (xls)
69th Update coming into force April 2014
The 69th Update to the Civil Procedure Rules introduces changes in a number of areas, the two main changes being the implementation of the single County Court and bailiff and enforcement reform. The amendments for this update are contained in a Statutory Instrument and Practice Direction Making Document.
Further amendments in relation to Certification of Enforcement Agents will be issued shortly. These changes will be included in the 70th Update to the CPR and will commence in April 2014.
The amendments to the rules in respect of the small claims mediation scheme come into force on 1 April 2014, rules in respect of bailiff and enforcement reform on 6 April 2014 and subject to parliamentary approval of the relevant secondary legislation need to give effect to the operation of the single County Court, the intention is to implement section 17(1) and (2) of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 on 22 April 2014. Please note the transitional provisions contained in the Statutory Instrument and Practice Direction Making Document.
The Crime and Courts Act 2013 established the single County Court by making provision for the removal of geographical jurisdictional boundaries from the county courts. The County Court will sit at various locations within England and Wales in a way similar to the High Court and will have a single seal and a single identity to indicate its national jurisdiction. The court houses in which it will convene will act as hearing centres with court administrative offices attached to them.
The introduction of the single County Court requires consequential amendments throughout the CPR, for example the renaming of individual county courts as County Court hearing centres, these amendments have not been itemised individually in this summary of the changes.
All claims issued at the County Court Money Claims Centre or at the renamed County Court Business Centre (including those issued online through Money Claim Online) will remain at the business centre of receipt up to the point where a hearing is required, or the claimant wishes to enforce a judgment other than by way of issue of a warrant. Restrictions on where particular types of claim may be issued, e.g. forfeiture claims are removed. However, if a claim has not been started in the appropriate County Court hearing centre, then, following issue, the claim or application will be sent or transferred to the appropriate hearing centre in accordance with the relevant rules and practice directions relating to those proceedings.
The Tribunal Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 unifies the law governing the activities of enforcement agents when taking control of and selling goods. It also modernises and unifies most of the terminology used in various pieces of legislation. Commencement of Part 3 of the Act has provided the opportunity to consolidate the majority of enforcement rules contained in Schedule 1 and 2 into the Civil Procedure Rules.
Part 2 Application and interpretation of the Rules, Practice Direction 2A – Court Offices, PD2B – Allocation of cases to levels of judiciary
The definition 'defendant’s home court' is revised in the context of the County Court to reflect the national jurisdiction, the address where the defendant resides or carries on business will determine the appropriate County Court hearing centre.
Similarly the definition of 'preferred court' is amended. The definition 'designated money claim' is removed as all money only claims made under Part 7 of the CPR will now be processed at one of the two business centres; cases will no longer be 'transferred' between county courts but will be sent between court offices.
The definition of 'judge' now reflects the amendment of section 5 of the County Courts Act 1984. These amendments reflect the commencement of the single County Court and the intended implementation date is 22 April 2014.
Consequential amendments in respect of the single County Court are made in Parts 3 and PD3C, PD4, PD5A, PD5C, PD7A, PD7B, PD7C, PD7E, PD8A, Parts 13, 14, PD19A, Part 23 and PD23A, PD25A, Part 26 and PD26A, Part 30 and PD 30, PD34A, PD37, Part 44, Part 47 and PD47, PD 49A, PD51A, PD52D, Part 55, PD55A and PD55B, PD56, Part 57 PD57, Part 60 and PD60, Part 61, Part 63 and PD63, Part 65 and PD65, Part 67, Part 70 and PD70, Part 71 and PD71, Part 72 and PD72, Part 73 and PD73, Part 74 and PD74A, PD74B, Part 75 and PD75, PD78, PD 81, PD: Directors Disqualification, PD Devolution Issues, CCR Order 27, Pre-Action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes and Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes
PD3E – Costs Management
Precedent H is amended to include the statement of truth set out in PD22, 2.2A.
Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Precedent H (PDF)
Precedent H (xls)
Part 8 Alternative Procedure for Claims
The amendment provides that a claim in the county court under Part 8 may be commenced at any County Court hearing centre. (Intended implementation date 22 April 2014.)
Part 12 Default Judgment and Part 14 Admission
For those County Court claims where a request for judgment which includes an amount of money to be decided by the court is filed, the claim will be sent to the preferred County Court hearing centre. Intended implementation date 22 April 2014.
Part 16 Statements of case
Amendments are made to reflect changes to the High Court and County Court Jurisdiction Order 1991 which will provide that financial claims below £100,000 must be made in the County Court. PD7A is also amended. Intended implementation date 22 April 2014.
Part 21 Children and Protected Parties
This part is disapplied in respect of enforcement of specified debts by taking control of goods and applications in relation to such enforcement where one of the parties is a child. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
PD22 – Statement of Truth
The statement of truth to be used in verifying a costs budget is amended. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Part 26 Case Management – Preliminary Stage and PD26 – Case Management – Preliminary Stage: Allocation and Re-allocation
The Small Claims Mediation pilot scheme set out in PD51I is made permanent and PD51I is omitted. Coming into force 1 April 2014.
Part 40 Judgments, Orders, Sale of Land etc
A number of provisions are moved to the CPR from the schedule rules in respect of stay of execution, variation of payment, County Court set off of cross-judgments, County Court certificate of judgment, and notification to the County Court of an order of the appeal court. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Part 42 Change of Solicitor
Amendments are made to allow any person who, for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007, is an authorised person in relation to an activity which constitutes the conduct of litigation (within the meaning of that Act) to be entered on the court record. This reflects all those legal representatives who now have the right to conduct litigation, including legal executives, costs lawyers, patent attorneys, and trade mark attorneys. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Part 45 Fixed Costs and PD45 Fixed Costs
An amendment is made to Part 45 to correct an omission, and the PD is amended to correct a cross reference. Coming into force 6 April 2014
PD51I The Second Mediation Service Pilot Scheme
The Practice Direction is revoked and the scheme is made permanent (see Part 26). Coming into force on 1 April 2014.
Part 52 Appeals
An amendment is made to provide that any order refusing permission to appeal will indicate the court to which any further application should be made and the level of judge who should hear the application.
A further amendment is made introducing a permission filter in respect of appeals to the High Court in respect of determinations or directions of the Pension Ombudsman.
Both amendments come into force on 6 April 2014.
Practice Direction 52B is amended to correct an error in Table A. Intended coming into force date 22nd April 2014.
Part 63 Intellectual Property Claims
An amendment is made to enable service to be effected on a UK address, in respect of a registered right in an Intellectual Property claim, where the address for service given for that right is in the appropriate register at the United Kingdom Patent Office or the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Part 70 and PD70 – Enforcements of Judgments and Orders
New rule 70.2A replaces RSC Order 45 rule 8. Amendments are made to the Practice Direction to reflect the new terminology in respect of writs and warrants. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Part 74 Enforcement of judgments in different jurisdictions, Part 75 Traffic Enforcement and PD 75 – Traffic Enforcement, CCR Order 27 Attachment of Earnings and CCR Order 28 Judgment Summonses
Amendments are made consequential to the introduction of Parts 83 to 86. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
PD 81 Contempt and Committal
Amendments are made consequential to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, to provide that funding in cases of contempt is provided under criminal legal aid. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Part 83 and PD 83 Writs and Warrants – General Provisions
A new part is introduced consolidating the High and County Court rules on enforcement contained in Schedule 1 and 2 and implementing changes brought about by the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Part 84 and PD 84 Enforcement by Taking Control of Goods
A new part is introduced to bring into effect the Taking Control of Goods provision in the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Part 85 Claims on Controlled Goods and Executed Goods
A new part consolidates the High Court and County Court rules on interpleaders in relation to goods taken into control, goods subject to a writ of execution and claims in relation to goods and exempt goods. Consequently RSC Order 117 and CCR Order 33 are omitted. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
Part 86 Stakeholder Claims and Applications
A new part consolidates the High Court and County Court rules in relation to competing claims against a person who is under a liability in relation to a debt or goods. Consequently RSC Order 117 and CCR Order 33 are omitted. Coming into force 6 April 2014.
RSC Orders 17, 45, 46, 47, and 113 are omitted. Practice Direction RSC 46 is omitted. Coming into force 6th April 2014.
CCR Orders 22, 24, 25, 26 and 33 are omitted. Practice Direction CCR 26 is omitted. Coming into force 6th April 2014.
N182 is introduced
Precedent H is amended.
Forms N5, N5B N42, 46, 48, 52, N88, N88(1), N89, N276, N277, N358, N359, N360, N362, N363, N364, N365, N434, N463, Nos 53, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66A, 67, 68, 69 and 71; PF 23, 34, 25, 26, 27 and 97 will be amended or replaced.
68th Update came into force 1 January 2014
In the 68th update to the Civil Procedure Rules the amendments deal primarily with a rule change arising from the removal by section 11 of the 2013 Act of the presumption of trial with a jury in libel and slander cases, which leaves the judge with discretion (in common with that in most other civil proceedings) to order jury trial where it is appropriate to do so.
The rule change ensures that any application for the court to exercise its remaining discretion to order jury trial must be made at the first case management conference. Amendments are also made to the Practice Direction supporting the rules to reflect certain changes in terminology arising from the 2013 Act. Part 26 Case Management – Preliminary Stage and the Practice Direction supporting Part 3 Defamation Claims are amended
The Statutory Instrument
The Practice Direction Making Document (PDF)
No forms are amended.
67th Update came into force 13 November 2013
The 67th Update to the Civil Procedure Rules introduces a free-standing practice direction - Solicitors’ negligence in Right to Buy cases (transfer of existing and new claims to the Chancery Division and appointment of designated judge).
The Practice Direction came into force on 13 November 2013.
66th Update coming into force 1 October 2013
The 66th Update to the Civil Procedure Rules introduces changes in a number of areas. The amendments to the Rules are contained in a Statutory Instrument and Practice Direction Making Document.
The amendments to the Rules come into force on 1 October 2013, but there are amendments to PD3E Costs Management, PD51I The Second Mediation Service Pilot Scheme, and PD 75 Traffic Enforcement which come into force on 1st, 29th and 2nd September respectively. Please note the transitional provisions in respect of the establishment of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court as set out in the Statutory Instrument.
PD3E Costs Management
A revised Precedent H is substituted.
PD19B Group Litigation
Minor amendments are made to rules governing Group Litigation Orders, to ensure consistency.
PD21 Children and Protected Parties
Amendments are made to the monetary level at which damages funds are administered by a deputy appointed by the Court of Protection (COP). Currently if the damages awarded to a protected party are £30,000 or less the sum may be retained in court and invested in the same way as the fund of a child. The increase to £50,000 is coupled with a provision that allows District Judges and Masters to ask the COP to sanction a higher sum to remain in the Court's control.
Part 45 and PD45 – Fixed Costs
An amendment is made to Rule 45.29E Table D, to correct a typographical error. Further amendments are made as a consequence of the reconstitution of the Patents County Court and the amendment of scale costs for proceedings in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.
Part 47 Procedure for Assessment of Costs and Default Provisions
A modification is made to clarify the amount of costs that may be recovered for matters that do not go beyond provisional assessment of costs, and whether that amount includes court fees and VAT.
PD51I The Second Mediation Service Pilot Scheme
The pilot scheme is extended for a further period up until 31 March 2014.
PD52B Appeals in the County Courts and High Court
Amendments are made to correct terminology and to make corrections to the table identifying appeal centres.
PD52C Appeals to the Court of Appeal
Amendments are made to provide for the filing of skeleton arguments and lodging and filing of other documents related to appeals.
PD52D Statutory Appeals and Appeals subject to special provision
Amendments are made to allow for appeals against decisions of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal to be made from when the statement of reasons for a decision is given rather than the decision itself.
Part 63 and PD63 Intellectual Property
Amendments are made following provisions in the Crime and Courts Act 2013 to reconstitute the Patents County Court as a free-standing specialist list in the Chancery Division, to be called the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. Amendments to scale costs in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court are set out in PD 45. Consequential amendments are made to PD30 Transfer.
Part 68 and PD68 References to the European Court
Amendments are made to the procedure for requests for preliminary rulings to accommodate changes set out in the Rules of Procedure of the European Court.
Further amendments are made to reflect changes to the EU treaties; the coming into force of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; changes to the rules and procedures of the European Court; and the European Courts updated guidance to national courts.
PD75 Traffic Enforcement
Amendments are made to provide for the civil enforcement of the non-payment of charges arising under road user charging schemes made under Part 3 of the Transport Act 2000.
Amendments are made throughout the rules, practice directions and pre-action protocols to update cross references, remove duplication or redundant wording, correct typographical errors and ensure the rules are gender neutral. Amendments are made to: Parts 3, 7, 8, 15, 16, 21, 25, 28, 29,31,36, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44,45, 46, 52, 55, 62, 63, 67, RSC O.17, Practice Directions 2B, 4, 6A, 6B, 7A, 7B, 8A, 8B,10, 15, 16, 18, 19B, 23A, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 40B, 42, 46, 47, 51A, 52A, 64A, 67, 69, Pre-Action Conduct and the Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers’ Liability and Public Liability) Claims.
Forms: Precedent H is amended.
65th Update came into force 31 July 2013
The 65th Update to the Civil Procedure Rules extends the Low Value Personal Injury Scheme for Road Traffic Accidents to include claims valued at £10,000 to £25,000. In addition, the scheme is further extended to include most personal injury claims with a value of £1,000 to £25,000, as set out in the Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers’ Liability and Public Liability) Claims. A fixed costs scheme for claims which exit the protocol schemes and either settle or proceed to issue of a claim and judgment is introduced.
Amendments are also made to provide a procedure for an appeal by the prosecutor to the High Court against a grant of bail made by the Crown Court to effect an amendment to the Bail (Amendment) Act 1993 brought about by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012.
A signpost is added to direct users to the provisions for cost assessment in Civil Recovery Cases.
All amendments come into force on 31 July 2013.
Please note the amendments to Parts 36 and 45 apply only to claims started under the Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents where the Claim Notification Form (CNF) is sent in accordance with that Protocol on or after 31 July 2013. The Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents which was in force before 31 July 2013 shall continue to have effect in respect of any claim where the Claim Notification Form was sent before that date. A copy of the Low Value Personal Injury Claim Pre-Action Protocol is retained on the CPR website and will be marked appropriately.
Part 36 and PD36 Offers to settle and payments into court
New rules make provision in respect of the fixed costs a claimant may recover where the claimant either accepts or fails to beat a defendant’s offer to settle made under Part 36 of the CPR. Provision is also made with regard to defendants’ costs in those circumstances. If a defendant refuses a claimant’s offer to settle and the court subsequently awards the claimant damages which are greater than or equal to the sum they were prepared to accept in settlement, the claimant will not be limited to receiving his fixed costs, but will be entitled to costs assessed on the indemnity basis in accordance with rule 36.14. Provision is also made both in respect of defendants’ costs where a defendant successfully counterclaims and the costs recoverable by both parties in related interim applications.
Part 45 and PD45 Fixed Costs
A new Section IIIA, set out in the Schedule to this instrument, is also inserted into Part 45. New Section IIIA provides for a fixed costs regime in respect of those claims which exit the RTA and EL/PL Protocols and which are subsequently settled or proceed to judgment. Again the costs which might be recovered are prescribed in the rules, the amount depending upon the nature of the claim, the stage the proceedings have reached and the damages which might be agreed or awarded.
Provision in Section IIIA is also made in respect of defendants’ costs in those cases where the fixed costs regime would otherwise apply. Accordingly, in those cases where a costs order is made in favour of a defendant, the court, when assessing the defendant’s costs, will have regard to, and the amount recoverable should not exceed, the amount of costs which the claimant would have been able to recover at the same stage of the proceedings had a costs order been made in favour of the claimant. This provision is subject to two exceptions: first, where a claim is struck out or found to be fundamentally dishonest and the claimant loses their protection under the qualified one way cost shifting provisions in Part 44 of the CPR, the court may assess the defendant’s costs without reference to the costs which would have been recoverable by the claimant. Secondly, this rule will not apply where the court makes an order for costs under new rules 36.10A or 36.14
Consequential amendments are made to:
Part 14 Admissions;
Part 27 The Small Claim Track;
Practice Direction 8B The Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims In Road Traffic Accidents – Stage 3 Procedure;
Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims; and
Pre-Action Protocol for Disease and Illness Claims
Part 47 Procedure for Assessment of Costs and Default Provisions and Practice Direction – Civil Recovery Proceedings
A signpost is inserted to direct users the Civil Recovery Practice Direction which contains details of the procedure for the detailed assessment of costs in relation to civil recovery orders.
Schedule 1 RSC O.79 Criminal Proceedings
The LASPO Act 2012 (by amendment of the Bail (Amendment) Act 1993) introduced a provision to allow a right of appeal by prosecutors to the High Court against the grant of bail in the Crown Court. Amendments are made to set out the procedure in the CPR and a Practice Direction in support is introduced.
Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents
This Pre-Action Protocol replaces the current, similarly titled, Pre-Action Protocol and will apply to any claim for damages which arises from a road traffic accident where the Claim Notification Form to be sent under the Protocol is submitted on or after 31 July 2013.
The existing Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents is retained on the CPR for an interim period.
Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers’ Liability and Public Liability) Claims
A new Pre-Action Protocol is introduced which will apply to most employers’ liability and public liability claims up to the value of £25,000 in respect of an accident occurring on or after 31 July 2013 or, in a disease claim, where no letter of claim has been sent to the defendant before 31 July 2013
The Statutory Instrument (link to external website)
Forms RTA1-RTA7 are substituted for:
The following forms are also introduced:
64th Update came into force 27 June 2013
The 64th Update to the Civil Procedure Rules implements the provisions of the Justice and Security Act 2013 which enable the use of closed material procedure in civil proceedings.
The Justice and Security Act provides for closed material procedure to be available in civil proceedings where necessary to ensure that evidence which would otherwise fall to be disclosed to the other party or parties can still be used in the proceedings (rather than being excluded completely under a Public Interest Immunity certificate), being disclosed and heard 'in closed', with the other party or parties excluded and their interests represented by a special advocate.
Amendments are made to Parts 1, 12 and 30 and a new Part 82 Closed Material Proceedings is introduced.
The SI can be viewed at: www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1571/contents/made
63rd Update coming into force 1 July 2013
The 63rd Update to the Civil Procedure Rules amends Part 52 and Part 54 in respect of Judicial Review Claims. Consequential amendments are made to the Pre-Action Protocol for Judicial Review.
Part 52 is amended to remove the right to reconsideration at a hearing of the refusal of permission to bring Judicial Review (oral renewal) in cases where the application is certified as totally without merit by the Judge considering the application on the papers.
Part 54 is amended reduce the time limits for filing a claim form for judicial review to six weeks in relation to a decision under the 'planning acts' (the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, the Planning (Hazardous Substances) Act 1990 and the Planning (Consequential Provisions) Act 1990) and to 30 days in relation to a decision in a procurement regulated by the Public Contracts Regulations 2006.
Transitional Provisions - The Statutory Instrument comes into force on 1 July 2013.The amendments made to rules 52.15 and 54.12 do not apply to an application for judicial review where the claim form was filed before 1 July 2013. The amendments made to rule 54.5 do not apply to an application for judicial review where the grounds arose before 1 July 2013.
The amendments to the Rules are contained in a Statutory Instrument: The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.4) Rules 2013 Statutory Instrument 2013 No. 1412.
You can also view the Pre-Action Protocol.
62nd Update came into force 30 April 2013
The 62nd Update to the Civil Procedure Rules amends the fixed costs available in cases in the Low Value Personal Injury Claim Protocol for Road Traffic Accidents.
The amendments to the Rules are contained in a Statutory Instrument: The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.3) Rules 2013 Statutory Instrument 2013 No.789
61st Update (supplementary to 60th Update) came into force 1 April 2013
The 61st Update to the Civil Procedure Rules introduces changes in respect of costs management, transitional provisions in respect of the proportionality test and allows for an expansion in scope of the small claim mediation pilot. The amendments to the Rules are contained in a Statutory Instrument and Practice Direction Making Document which can be viewed at:
The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.2) Rules 2013 Statutory Instrument 2013 No.515. You can also view the Practice Direction amendments by viewing the Practice Direction making document.
60th Update 1 April 2013
The 60th Update to the Civil Procedure Rules introduces changes in a number of areas. The amendments to the Rules are contained in a Statutory Instrument and Practice Direction Making Document.
The amendments come into force on 1 April 2013. Please note there are transitional provisions in respect of a number of the rules. Full details are set out in the Statutory Instrument and those relating to funding arrangements are set out in Part 48.
Part 1 - Overriding Objective
The overriding objective of the rules is strengthened to enable to the courts to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost.
Part 3 – The Court’s Case Management Powers
PD3E Costs Management
PD3F Costs Capping
Rules are amended to allow the court to monitor parties’ compliance with directions.
The scope of the rules on applications for relief from sanctions is widened to provide the court with the power to deal with failure to conduct litigation at proportionate cost (this amendment only applies to applications made on or after 1 April 2013).
A new section governing costs management for multi-track cases (with the exception of those cases proceeding in the Admiralty and Commercial Courts) is introduced in Part 3. Costs budgets are introduced and the court will require the parties to file a costs budget at an early stage of the proceedings and parties will be encouraged to agree the budgets where possible. The court may make a “costs management order” and if it does so will thereafter control the parties’ budgets in respect of recoverable costs. Cost capping rules previously contained in Part 44 are moved into this part and parties are additionally required to file a costs budget rather than an estimate of costs with any application for a costs capping order. PD3E and PD3F are inserted. Consequential amendments are made to PD22 and the Practice Direction – Pre-Action Conduct.
Your attention is drawn to the document issued by the President of the QB Division and the Chancellor of the High Court in respect of an amendment to rule 3.12(1). Costs Budgeting Direction amending new CPR rule 3.12 (PDF 40.7kb)
Part 26 – Case Management – preliminary stage
(a) Increasing small claims track limit
Amendments are made to provide for an increase in the upper limit of the small claims track for civil claims (excluding personal injury and housing disrepair claims) from £5,000 to £10,000. A further amendment is made which removes the necessity for both parties to consent to a higher value case being allocated to the more suitable small claims track. Consequential amendments are made to Parts 16, 26, and 27. The change comes into force for all claims issued on or after 1 April 2013.
(b) Allocation Questionnaires
Rules are amended to allow for the substitution of the Allocation Questionnaire with the Directions Questionnaires. Two Directions Questionnaires are introduced; one for cases that are provisionally allocated to the small claims track and one for cases which may be allocated to the Fast or Multi-Track. Following the receipt of a defence the court will make a provisional decision as to which track is appropriate based on the value of the claim. The court will then send a notice to all parties requiring completion of the Directions Questionnaire; the notice may also contain other directions. Only where a party is a litigant in person will the court send out the appropriate Direction Questionnaire. Where a case is likely to be allocated to the Fast or Multi-Track parties will be required to file proposed or agreed directions. The time by which the completed Direction Questionnaire and accompanying documents must be filed is increased and parties will have at least 28 days from the deemed date of service of the notice in which to file the documents. All parties will be required to serve a copy of the completed Directions Questionnaire and any other documents required by the notice on all other parties. The agreed or proposed directions for Fast Track cases should follow those set out in Part 28, for Multi-Track cases standard and model directions can be found online. Consequential amendments are made to PD5A, PD5C, PD15, PD28 and PD29. These amendments apply where a defence is filed on or after 1 April 2013.
(c) Allocation of claims procedure
Amendments are made to ensure that where possible administrative processing of claims is centralised and cases are only transferred once a hearing is required. To facilitate this, rules are modified for designated money claims to allow staff to take steps where parties fail to return a Directions Questionnaire and to make stay orders to allow parties time to settle matters. These amendments apply where a defence is filed on or after 1 April 2013.
Practice Direction 27 – The Small Claims Track
Amendments are made to increase the amount that can be recovered for expert’s fees in a case allocated to the small claims track. An upper limit of £750 is introduced.
Part 29 – The Multi-Track
The rules are modified to require parties to endeavour to agree appropriate directions for the management of cases, and to submit directions seven days before any case management conference. This amendment does not apply to any case management conference due to or taking place before 9 April 2013. To assist parties a menu of standard directions for cases allocated to the Multi-Track are provided. The directions will be available electronically via a link on the Civil Procedure Rules website and on other websites. Parties will also been given confirmation by the court of the day or week in which the trial will begin following the filing of the pre-trial check list, a listing hearing or a pre-trial review.
Part 31 – Disclosure and inspection of documents
The rules on disclosure are expanded to allow for tailored rather than standard disclosure of material in Multi-Track cases except personal injury cases. Form N263 is introduced to facilitate this change. This amendment does not apply where the first case management conference takes place or is due to take place before 16 April 2013.
Part 32 – Evidence
The rules on evidence are amended to allow the court to give directions defining and limiting the factual evidence which may be called.
Part 35 – Experts and Assessors
A new rule is introduced requiring that an estimate of costs in respect of expert evidence is provided. Further amendments are made to clarify the issues which any expert will address and to allow the court to specify issues the expert evidence should address. These amendments do not apply in any application for permission made on or before 1 April 2013.
Practice Direction 35
Amendments are made to provide that the court may direct that experts from like disciplines shall give their evidence concurrently. The procedure following such a direction is also set out.
Part 36 – Offers to settle
The rules are modified to provide for an additional amount to be paid by a defendant who does not accept a claimant’s offer which the defendant then fails to beat at trial (that is, that the trial outcome is no more advantageous to the defendant than the claimant’s offer). These amendments do not apply in relation to a claimant’s Part 36 offer made before 1 April 2013.
Part 43 – General Rules about Costs
Part 43 is revoked.
Parts 44–48 and accompanying practice directions
The existing rules and supporting practice direction on costs have been redrafted to remove irrelevant and obsolete procedures. Changes of particular note are:
Part 44 – General Rules about Costs
(a) One way qualified costs shifting
Introducing rules for a new system of qualified one way costs shifting (QOCS) in personal injury cases, devised as an alternative to after the event (ATE) insurance. The effect of QOCS is that a losing claimant will not pay any costs to the defendant, and a successful claimant against who a costs order has been made (for example, where the claimant does not accept and then fails to beat the defendant’s “part 36 offer” to settle) will not have to pay those costs except to the extent that they can be set off against any damages received. QOCS protection will however be lost altogether if the claim is struck out or is found to be fundamentally dishonest. QOCS protection will be lost in part, and subject to the court’s permission, in two instances: first, if an otherwise successful claim includes an unsuccessful non-personal injury element (e.g. housing disrepair or costs of credit hire in arranging an alternative vehicle), and there is an order for costs against the claimant of that unsuccessful element, the claimant is liable for all the defendant’s costs of that unsuccessful element to the extent that it is just and fair; and second, where the claim, or an element of it, is made for the financial benefit of someone other than the claimant (e.g. a credit hire claim in respect of the financing company), an order for the defendant’s costs of the claim, or that element, may be made, and enforced, against that person/organisation.
(b) Damages-based agreements
Amendments are made in consequence of the introduction of damages-based agreements (DBAs) in civil proceedings. A DBA is a private funding
arrangement between a representative and a client whereby the representative’s agreed fee is contingent upon the success of the case and is determined as a percentage of the compensation received by the client. Under a DBA the lawyer may not recover by way of costs more than the total amount payable under the DBA fee.
Part 45 – Fixed Costs
Amendments are made to comply with the Aarhus Convention so that any system for challenging decisions in environmental matters is open to members of the public and is not prohibitively expensive. Two limits are set: on the costs recoverable by a defendant from a claimant (£5,000 where the claimant is an individual and £10,000 in any other circumstances) and; on the costs recoverable by a claimant from a defendant (£35,000). Consequential amendments are made to PD 25A, Part 54 and the Pre-Action Protocol Judicial Review. The amendments do not apply to a claim commenced before 1 April 2013.
Part 47 – Procedure for Detailed Assessment of Costs and Default Provisions
The rules relating to assessment of costs are redrawn to ensure that material presented to the court is relevant to the particular bill of costs and sets out any contentions clearly and concisely. Referral to authorities, quoting of well known judgments and explanations of and responses to individual points of dispute are discouraged.
The process for detailed assessment in which the costs claimed are £75,000 or less is amended. The court will undertake a provisional paper assessment of the bill, and the costs of the assessment will be limited to £1,500. If any party is dissatisfied with the assessment an oral hearing will be fixed. If the dissenting party achieves an adjustment in its favour by 20% or more they will not be required to pay the costs of the oral hearing.
Part 48 – Part 2 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. Relating to civil litigation funding and costs: Transitional provisions in relation to pre-commencement funding arrangements
The new rules set out the transitional provisions in relation to funding arrangements and identifies those classes of case where exemptions apply.
PD51D – Defamation Proceedings Costs Management Scheme
The PD is omitted, any proceedings commenced before 1 April 2013 within the scope of the pilot scheme will continue in accordance with the scheme.
PD51E – County Court Provisional Assessment Pilot Scheme
The PD is omitted, any detailed assessment commenced under the scheme before 1 April 2013 will be completed in accordance with the scheme.
PD51G – Costs Management in Mercantile Courts and Technology and Construction Courts – Pilot Scheme
The PD is omitted, any proceedings commenced before 1 April 2013 within the scope of the pilot scheme will continue in accordance with the scheme.
Part 52 – Appeals
Amendments are made to allow an application for an order that the recoverable costs of appeal be limited to the extent which the court specifies. The court will take into account the means of both parties; the circumstances of each case; and the need to facilitate access to justice before making any such order.
PD 52C – Appeals to the Court of Appeal
An amendment is made to ensure that in a second appeal to the Court of Appeal the appellant identifies the important point of principle or practice, or the compelling reason which is said to justify the grant of permission to appeal.
Part 63 – Intellectual Property Claims and PD63
Amendments are made as a consequence of the increase of the small claims track limit.
PD66 – Crown Proceedings
This amendment updates the list names and addresses of authorised government departments under which civil proceedings against the Crown are to be instituted.
Schedule 2 CCR Order 27
Rule 7A(3) is omitted as a consequence of introducing Part 81 in the previous update.
PD Civil Recovery Proceedings
Amendments are made to allow for commencement of applications for recovery orders in the Queens Bench Division and for the transfer of cases.
Pre-Action Protocol for Judicial Review
A change to the address of the Legal Services Commission is made, and amendments consequential on changes to Part 45.
Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents
A number of consequential amendments are made following revision of the costs rules and practice directions.
Two new terms are introduced into the Glossary: Budget and Damages-based agreement.
You can preview the rule changes in this amendment by viewing The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012 Statutory Instrument 2012 No. 262. You can also view the Practice Direction amendments by viewing the Practice Direction making document.
|Schedule of future costs precedents|
|A||A: Model form of bill of costs|
|F||F: Certificates for inclusion in bill of costs
||G: Points of Dispute and Reply
||H: Costs Budget
|H - Guidance
||H: Cost budget - guidance
||P: Solicitors Act 1974: breakdown of costs|
Annex C - List of authorised government departments
A number of forms are discontinued, introduced and amendment. A full list of the forms will be available shortly.
Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) is responsible for the provision of the CPR forms - if you have any comments or observations about the availability of court forms, please e-mail HMCTS.